whereas http://www.custompc.co.uk/labs/180 [...] 250gb.html actually says that the WD is faster than the barracuda both in read/write speed and in real-life performance (they used loading a level in Crysis)
Can someone explain this? Or am i missing some important detail in these benches?
Also, I've been reading a lot of the reviews on newegg, and a lot of them said that the seagate drives were DOA or that it failed on them within 1 hour of use. So... which one should I pick?
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.