Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » DVD/CD Writers » Help choosing among DVD RW drives
 

Help choosing among DVD RW drives




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Help choosing among DVD RW drives
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hello, my old DVD writer failed (it can read and write only CDs) and I need to buy new rive as sson as possible.
I have a few options (this is what is vaialbale to me today):

DVD RW LG H58N Double Layer +/- 20X
DVD RW LG H55/58N Double Layer +/- 20X, BLACK
DVD RW LG SATA Double Layer +/- 18X, BLACK, H20NS
DVD RW LG USB2.0 externi E60N retail, MULTI, 8.5GB
DVD RW LG USB2.0 externi E50N SLIM retail, MULTI, 8.5GB
DVD RW NEC AD-7200 Bulk
DVD RW NEC AD-7200 Bulk BLACK
DVD RW NEC AD-7200S All Format, SATA, Bulk BLACK
DVD RW NEC SlimLine for notebook, bulk
DVD RW ASUS BLACK RETAIL 20xDVD+-R/8xDL/14xDVD-RAM
DVD RW ASUS DRW-2014L1 20x Lightsc.black RET
DVD RW Pioneer DVR-115D-BK 20X bulk black
DVD RW Pioneer DVR-112D-BK 18X SATA bulk black


I'm close to buy Pioneer DVR-115D, but 100 % sure. What would you recommend?

Thnaks

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

none of those.

Samsung SH-S203B.


---------------
macgirlfriend:
"Hey I don't get you people, the people on insanely mac were so much nicer"
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

NEC=Sony, after the root kit crap, I don't buy Sony.
I have been happy with Philips and Samsung.

Profile: stranger
More Information

This is a subject i'm also looking into. Very nearly got the samsung sh-s203, until i saw there's an sh-s223 and the 203 doesn't seem to be available at overclockers Does anyone know the difference other than a 22x speed rather than 20x???

Mikas - pc advisor has the pioneer 215 115d in 4th spot and is highly recommended, but the sh-s203 is in 1st place. pioneer is eide not sata.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thank you guys, but I don't have option to buy any Samsung drive. It is not offered. It would be more expensive to order it via Internet and wait shipping and customs costs.
No, I placed as a list what I can buy.
I have both SATA and IDE ports on my MB. Why is it better to be sata?
Pioneer is more famous than any LG drive, so I'm closer to buy Pioneer. I don't know if I should buy 112D 18X which is SATA or 115D 20 x which is IDE.
I'm dissapointed that my Asus DRW 1608P lasted only 2 years, since I didn't use it much. It cannot read most DVD and cannot write DVD. For CDs it works great. Is there any way I can check something, maybe to try to repair it?

jsc
Profile: old hand
More Information

My first choice - Samsung, second choice - LG, third choice - anything else.

Used to really like Plextor's. Now, they are too expensive. Plus I had a PX-716 fail after less than a year a while back.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

then choose the "Sony dru-840a" if you can get it.
its the same hardware as the S203B.


---------------
macgirlfriend:
"Hey I don't get you people, the people on insanely mac were so much nicer"
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Go with the DVD RW Pioneer DVR-112D-BK 18X SATA since it is available to you. SATA drives because the smaller cable will help with cable clutter and air flow.


---------------
[QX6850 3.0Ghz][Zalman 9700][ASUS Rampage Formula X48][4Gb BallasticTracer PC2-8500][VisionTek HD3870 512MB][1xRaptorX 150GB/1x300GB & 1x500GB Seagate SATA][2xPlextor 810SA DVDRW][Tagan BZ 800W-PSU][Antec 900][Vista Ultimate 64bit]
Profile: addict
More Information

Like jsc, I liked plextor, But they were overpriced and they no longer make drives and I have a samsung that I like (Modified windows file so that I can use Nero to do a quality scan).
Have a Plextor 716A, Plextor 755 sata, Samsung, Sony (Will not buy again for 2 reasons DRM attempt and most are rebaged Liteon anyway), an LG and a Memorex (rebaged Forgot)
Of the ones listed I'ld probaly go with the Pioneer or the LG. I think the Asus may be a rebaged pioneer.
No performance difference between IDE vs Sata; however as dallasjoh point out the SATA has better cabling.
Generally I do not find to much differences in recording quality for the majority. I also tend to record DVDs at 8 -> 12 X. Use a scanning program to determine quality of DVD.

I would recomend you visit this site as there is a lot of info on the specific DVD writers. They also have quite a few reviews.

http://club.cdfreaks.com/


Message edited by RetiredChief on 07-19-2008 at 04:46:42 PM
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

I just recently purchased the PIONEER DVR-215DBK and if you have the option to buy that I would suggest it. It's very fast and quiet unlike my previous HP dvd 940.


---------------
http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z311/AUsch30/badge_wtp_02_3001.jpg
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle
I didn't do it
Profile: member
More Information

to answer your question of why sata is better then ide. sata has faster thru put and there is no master or slave jumper tp contend with and I'm using a LG DVDRAM GSA-H62L double sided with lightscribe


---------------
Did I hit you with a Mack Truck?

 

Profile: addict
More Information

Ref kg4icg:
While SATA150 and 300 Have greater throughput, DVD drives do not benifit from this as they are not bootlenecked by the IDE channel Throughput of 133. So NO performance gain.

Yes Master/slave is a small plus BUT not that big, the biggest Plus is the cabling.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

not to mention most new mobos only have ONE ide port


---------------
macgirlfriend:
"Hey I don't get you people, the people on insanely mac were so much nicer"
I didn't do it
Profile: member
More Information

inwhich ide is slowly dying because of the easy features of sata and 2 there is an advantage sata has over ide's in dvd drives, especially in video encoding and playback. ide is a bottleneck in that aspect


---------------
Did I hit you with a Mack Truck?

 

Profile: addict
More Information

kg4icp:
Repeat No performance difference, Even for video encoding/playback.
Data beeing stripped off of a DVD is a function of read/write speed which is the same for IDE or Sata. I am not defending IDE. and yes it may/will die off - 5 or so years from know. Any performance difference for video encoding is primarly a function of processor/memory speed. And yes there is some difference between brands of drives - BUT NOT because it is sata or IDE. Max data that can be read from a DVD is based on the drive RPM's and this is well under the 133 of IDE.

My IDE drive performed Identical as the SATA drive. I ONLY changed my 2nd IDE DVD drive to sata because of cabling.

Profile: member
More Information

Pretty much all brand name dvd writers for pcs are good these days whether its sata or ide give or take a little speed and performance.Selecting a dvd writer isn't like selecting a mobo, processer,video card, etc. you can go with about 8 or 9 brand names on the market whether they or sata or ide and they will all work decent, i mean common it's a dvd writer and thats what it is.


Message edited by inspector71 on 08-02-2008 at 01:34:12 PM
Profile: member
More Information