Just wondering if anyone would be able to share their expertise/experiences regarding OC'ing the Q6600 (2.4Ghz).
I have read that many people out there have been able to OC'd their Q6600 well beyond the 3Ghz mark using a standard HSF but I have been quite
unsuccessful. I have read many OC'ing guides on the net and have tried so many different BIOS configuration combinations for eg: various CPU/DDR
frenquencies, voltages, multiplier speeds, DDR RAM timings, temperatures are acceptable and I have only been able to get my Q6600 stable at 2.66Ghz, anything higher results in
Vista failing to boot and/or if it does boot, it ends up crashing due to major instability issues. which I think is quite sad.
I would be satisfied with my Q6600 running stable at 3Ghz but would be even more happy if I could get it to run stable at 3.2Ghz and I know I'm not
asking for much because I have read that others have been able to successfully OC using air cooling up to approx 3.4Ghz.
I have listed my specs below so if any of you guys/girls out there that have a similar config and have successfully OC'd their Q6600 to decent speeds, I
would love to hear from you.
If you also by looking at my specs, if you suspect that any of my components may be a problems/causing a bottleneck then please point it out.
Also if I failed to list/mentioned required information then please ask.
I would start by setting all settings to default. Then tweak your memory... start by setting all the timings manually. In your case 5-5-5-15-2T, and Link it with the cpu fsb and set to sync.
Then I would start by raising FSB up to 300. This should give you 2700mhz. If it boots then you are ok... restart and raise to about 333. This should give you 3000mhz. Then if it doesnt boot simply raise cpu volts up one (for example... my mobo allows me to raise up .01V incrememts... i think) so raise up one whatever from stock or auto. Conitnue to do this until it boots. If it wont even boot at all then start all over in smaller increments (clear CMOS) like 300/310/320..... You should be able to get to 3.0ghz without touching the voltages... but if you cant you will have to mess with them.
If you impatiant. Set the memory like mentioned... set the voltage for cpu to 1.4 and see if it even boots at 333mhz fsb or 3000mhz cpu frequ. If it doesnt than you have some bum component. It could be memory... might be a good idea to memtest at every instable instance to eliminate memory. Could be PSU if it's hardlocking... could be CPU if everything else is good.
I doubt it's a PSU... is the rig hardlocking on boot? If it's just a BSOD than I dont think that a PSU is a culprit. Try using just one memory module that you have and then try with the other.
I find that if I push the PC8500 frequency in eccess of 1066Mhz only then it'll unable to POST but as long as I keep the RAM under 1066Mhz it does pass POST.
I hit the wall when POST passes and you see the Vista loading progress bar, about 3 secs after that the systel halts with a message stating something along the lines of "Hardware Failure"
I admit that I have not run any RAM tests but this is the 3rd set of RAM modules I've therefore quite unlikely that all 2 sets are faulty.
I'm wondering if you might have a corrupt install of Vista... Although highly unlikely.
What are you idle temps in bios for cpu?
There could be a possibility that your PSU may be faulty... I would try another one if you have it laying around. Maybe remove a GPU to see if that helps.
There should be no reason that you cant get this sucker to well above 3.0, have you had this chip for awhile or is it new? Could be looking at a bad chip.
I've managed to successfully OC my Q6600 and have got it running stable on 3Ghz using the standard Intel cooler with my ThermalTake 750w PSU.
I'm running at "9 x 333Mhz = 3000Mhz"
I tried to OC it to 3.2Ghz and also tried higher voltages but was unable to successfully pass POST.
Would it be safe to assume that I'm unable to exceed 3Ghz due to the standard Intel cooler I'm using desptie that I'm getting the below temps running at 3Ghz?
Current temps and voltages are listed below:
Temps CPU: 50
Motherboard: 40
North Bridge: 70
South Bridge: 58
Voltages Vcore: 1.35
CPU (PLL): 1.6
CPU (VTT): 1.36
North Bridge: 1.3
South Bridge: 1.5
RAM: 2.2
Just wanted to let you guys know that today I bought a Zalman 9700NT and my CPU idle has dropped down from 50 to approx 32, which is a major improvement.
So i tried to OC an hopefully push on beyond the 3Ghz limit but the furthest I was able to OC, with the stable being stable is a max of 3.1Ghz.
I was hoping that with the new cooler I could have at least hit 3.2Ghz or maybe 3.3Ghz but looks like I'm unable to OC my Q6600 any further.
Should I give up guys and settle for 3.1Ghz or would any of you guys have some last minute advice/tips I could try in order for me to OC a little higher?
Let me know.
My settings are:
Voltages
Vcore: 1.34375
CPU (PLL): 1.58
CPU (VTT): 1.34
North Bridge: 1.3
South Bridge: 1.5
RAM: 2.2
9 x 345 = 3.1Ghz.
DDR Ram set to 1066Mhz
Ram timings set to 5-5-5-15.
PS:
Now that I'm running the Zalman 9700, it's safe to say that the reason that I can only hit 3.1Ghz is NOT due to CPU heating issues.
First off congratulations on the lower temps... that must feel good!
I think that you might be rushing the overclocking a bit. You need to get memtest and make sure that your memory is stable at those timings. I know it's pc8500 memory but it's still overclocked from the FSB.
Also you should be doing one thing at a time. All settings should be auto/default and then you should be looking for max stable overclock with just the cpu fsb being raised... then raise the voltage for just the cpu... then once you cannot go any further determine if it's the memory, cpu or NB/SB that is keeping you from higher frequencies. You will know with memtest and prime95. Once you figure that out you should start raising the NB/SB voltage.
I can tell you right now that you are doing pretty good voltage wise with the 3.1ghz overclock. I'm going to refer you to xtremesystems.org for the full Q6600 overclocking thread. People there have the same set-up and can tell you what voltage configurations they are doing to get there max overclock... I know that not may can get to 3500-3700 with anything below 1.4v min.
Get involved with the people that have the same components with you and they can guide you a lot better than anyone... especially considering there pretty hardcore enthusiasts over there at xtreme!
If it wasn't for people like you always willing to give advice this would have been a much more difficult mission for me.
It does feel good knowing that my CPU temp has dropped down 15 to 20 degrees.
OC'd at 3.1Ghz CPU temp averages from between 32 to 35 depending how hot it is in my study.
I did stress test my system last night using Prime95 and ran the Torture Test all night for approx 8hrs and when I checked up on it in the morning, it was still running strong.
Mate I can't believe you referred me to "xtremesystems org".
Thanks heaps for that and can you believe I have already signed up for an account there.
I'll check out some of the posts there and see if I can get anymore useful tips.
I'll keep in touch mate and will let you know how I go.
I found a lot of help over there at xtremesystems... the guys over there start threads on specific motherboards and procs as soon as they come out. Some of the threads are watered down but they are true dedicated enthusiasts. NOt that the people here arent... it's just different I guess.
Those temps are perfect. Now you can start bumping up the FSB a little at a time to see where the max is with that voltage that you selected.
I have the same mobo and CPU and could not overclock at all. Then I used the CPUID program to check the CPU voltage and found it was much lower than what I'd set in BIOS. So my advice is to increase BIOS voltage until the real voltage is 1.35V. Then you should have no problem overclocking.
Also Anandtech showed you need to disable Loadline calibration. Don't try overclocking memory and CPU together at first so unlink the bus speed from the memory speed. I have 3.1GHz and have not even tried to go faster yet. According to the web sites I've read 3.3-3.6 on air GHz or so should be possible.