Lapping, surface area, and heat dissipation

boredguy8

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2008
23
0
18,510
With a good thermal paste, wouldn't a 'rough' cover for your CPU and heatsink base actually improve heat dissipation because you have more surface area? Or is there just no paste that's as good as basically touching everywhere along the surface?
 

Mondoman

Splendid
The issue is that the metal CPU heat spreader and metal heatsink base conduct heat MUCH better than any thermal compound, so the problem is not getting the heat to the thermal compound (as you suggest), but rather the heat passing through the thermal compound itself. Thus, the thermal compound layer is the bottleneck in heat transfer, and the thinner the thermal compound layer, the better. The smoother the CPU and hs base, the thinner the thermal compound layer can be.
 

boredguy8

Distinguished
Feb 17, 2008
23
0
18,510
Thanks for the feedback. Has anyone been baller enough to stick them together -without- thermal paste? Or would that be a _really_ bad idea?

Also, why don't chip manufacturers manufacture a unified cover/heatsink combo?
 

Evilonigiri

Splendid
Jun 8, 2007
4,381
0
22,780
You don't have to use thermal paste. All thermal paste does is make the contact between the IHS and cooler better. However, it is highly not recommended to not use thermal paste.
 

Lupiron

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2008
1,711
0
19,780
Give it a shot, your CPU will shut off at 100c, hehe, with no ill effects. Yet. No matter if all the options are disabled. Learned that when the capacitors near the socket were stopping my waterblock from touching the CPU, couldnt figure out why it kept powering down after 8 seconds, hehe, until I jumped into the bios fast like and seen the temps! 116 c? Wow, now thats a TCase!

--Lupi