Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » Bus speed help... please
 

Bus speed help... please




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Bus speed help... please
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I have an E6750 which I'm either gonna use in an X38 or P35 mobo, not sure yet which. The Proc runs at 1333mhz bus speed which I understand is 333mhz, quad-pumped. I will get a mobo that has a 1333mhz bus again which I understand to be a base clock speed of 333mhz, quad-pumped. My question is about the RAM bus speed relationship to the other two. I was planning on DDR2-800mhz which I understand is 400mhz dual-pumped? Now I see the base clock is higher for the RAM at 400mhz but if it cannot run at quad-pumped would I see better performance from DDR2 with a faster base clock? Or because it cant quad-pump 400mhz is plenty? Or am I just completely misunderstanding all of this? If anyone has any suggestions about the motherboard I would appreciate it. Thank you guys.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: addict
More Information

Rather than using terms like 'quad-pumped' etc, I find it easier when explained like this:

CPU FSB is 1333MHz, which is an actual speed of 333MHz
The RAM is DDR800 which is an actual speed of 400MHz

As it stands, the motherboard would run both at stock speeds using a 5:6 (CPU:FSB) ratio, or divider.

If you wanted a 1:1 ratio, which many people think gives best performance, you would have to overclock the CPU so its FSB was running at 400MHz the same as the RAM (you would need to use an aftermarket CPU cooler rather than the stock Intel one, and your chip would now be at 3.2GHz), or underclock the RAM so it was running at 333MHz the same as the CPU.

Does this make sense?

Profile: newbie
More Information

got a question though,

CPU FSB 800Mhz (E4500)
RAM DDR667Mhz (apacer)

i tried using the defaults still getting the sod..
i'm using the msi-p35 neo

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thank you for the reply GSTe. Thats pretty much what I was wondering, I guess the actual speed is whats most important. So I guess RAM cannot be quad-pumped at this time. I wonder how much slower the CPU and mobo would be without the quad-pumping, just using the actual speed.

So far I have an E6750, an Artic 7 HSF and an Nvidia 8800gt Alpha Dog edition. So now Im deciding on Mobo, ram and psu.

Profile: addict
More Information

jtcloud9 wrote :

Thank you for the reply GSTe. Thats pretty much what I was wondering, I guess the actual speed is whats most important. So I guess RAM cannot be quad-pumped at this time. I wonder how much slower the CPU and mobo would be without the quad-pumping, just using the actual speed.

So far I have an E6750, an Artic 7 HSF and an Nvidia 8800gt Alpha Dog edition. So now Im deciding on Mobo, ram and psu.



They would be a lot slower, quad pumped means that data is transmitted 4 times per CPU clock cycle, so probably 4 times slower. RAM can't be quad pumped, no. DDR means double data rate, and indicates that data is transmitted twice every clock cycle.

For the RAM I'd recommend any Crucial Ballistix as its pretty cheap at the minute and performs well. PSu wise I have a Corsair 620W HX and I love it, the 5 year warranty is reassuring too. For the mobo it depends on which chipset you want really. There are a lot of good P35 boards around, but several of the X38s are getting good reviews as well.

There is ALWAYS a drone.
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

I just have the stock cooler on my e6750, but I wanted to run my RAM at 1:1 also. I raised the FSB to 400 MHz and dropped the multiplier from 8 to 7. I see no change in temps but I think I see a small performance improvement. I didn't run benchmarks though, so I'm not making any claims.
That would be a tiny overclock by the standards of this forum, but hey it works.


---------------
There is ALWAYS a drone. Exactly where, or how many drones you will encounter may vary, but that there will be at least one will not.
Profile: addict
More Information

dashu31 wrote :

got a question though,

CPU FSB 800Mhz (E4500)
RAM DDR667Mhz (apacer)

i tried using the defaults still getting the sod..
i'm using the msi-p35 neo



Does it even boot? Have you tried booting with just 1 stick of ram?

Profile: old hand
More Information

I would keep the multiplier at 8 and actually overclock. The stock cooler is pretty good, should handle it. Get the P35, gigabytes ds3l is under $100.

Profile: addict
More Information

The cooler will allow the overclock, it's just the temps I'd be worried about.... I certainly wouldn't trust it myself when going from 2.66 to 3.2GHz, probably be looking in the high 60C range with a voltage bump.

Profile: newbie
More Information

it does boot. it just doesn't finish installing windows.
have the same problem before, with 1066FSB and DDR800mhz, it turns out my board doesn't support oc', so what i did was i turned down the ram to 667/533mhz.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » Bus speed help... please

Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

GPS can help give early warning of tsunamis

Published on June 30, 2006

Using GPS (global positioning system) data to measure how points on land move following an undersea earthquake could help geologists decide if the tremor will cause an ocean-wide tsunami. Read more

Mobile breakthrough doubles chip speed

Published on August 22, 2006

Engineers at the University of Southampton have developed technology to double the speed of chips commonly used in mobile devices. Read more

Indilinx Speeds Up SSDs To 230 MB/s

Published on August 15, 2008

Milpitas (CA) - Solid state disk (SSD) drives are likely to see further speed increases from the currently fastest drives that provide read speeds of about 200 MB/s to the theoretical maximum of 300 MB/s. Read more

Western Digital debuts 2.5" hard drives

Published on October 04, 2004

Western Digital (WD) today launched its first harddrives for the growing notebook segment. The Scorpio series models are available in capacities from 40 to 80 GByte. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more