Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Heat too high for q6600??? PLS help
 

Heat too high for q6600??? PLS help




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Heat too high for q6600??? PLS help
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

Hi,
these are my pc specs:
p5n32-e sli
q6600 (AC freezer 7 pro)
ASUS 8800gts 320mb
2x 2gb mushkin 800mHz 4-4-4-12

i had several atempts to OC my last cpu (e6750) but now im playing with my new toy, the q6600. i read some articles about OC-ing it and this is what i came up with....

i tryed to oc my q6600 at 3gb and i made it only increasing the fsb at 333. i have to mention that i didn't touched any voltage, only the ram one wich is set at 2.025 with 800mHz and 4-4-4-12 2T.

my pc booted straight away and i started monitoring it, so ...
30 degrees IDLE
65 degrees in full load - according to speedfan

core #0: 69
core #1: 69
core #2: 63
core #3: 63 ACCORDING TO CORE TEMP

FSB : DRAM 5:6 according to cpu-z

What do u think?
1. is it normal to reach this speed only increasing the fsb and no change to the voltages?

2. is this heat (65 degrees in full load) too much for my cpu?

3. what about the temps i have in core temp?

4. Should i do something regarding the memory ratio, i mean to get at 1:1?

5. Any changes in bios that can reduce the heat for my CPU?

6. is it safe using my pc 24/7 OC'ed in this way ?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

1.) Yes. You could probably bring down the voltage a little more.
2.) The general rule of thumb is stay under 65C for full load, which is the small FFT test.
3.)The temps from Coretemps are accurate. They reflect your "core temps".
4.) That's entirely up to you. There won't be any notable difference if the timings are set accordingly.
5.) Minimize vcore.
6.) Get your temps lower than 65C and make sure your system passes Prime95's small FFT test for at least 12hours and blend test for at least 14hours. This is because running 24/7 requires longer stressing.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Sniper
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information
Profile: newbie
More Information

dude, i just said that i didnt change any voltage only the ram (mushkin) one. vcore, nb,sb are on auto...

Profile: newbie
More Information

any other oppinions ?pls

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

When you say no change to the voltages... do you mean they are on AUTO? As in, CPU VCore voltage is on Auto?

--Lupi

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Wow, you sign off quick! As in, if the voltages are on auto, believe it or not, the boards tend to add more voltage than you need, especially to the processor as you up the FSB and therefor the processors speed.

 

You can look and see where its set at currently while on Auto. (Hopefully your MoBo supports this and shows you the current values as well, even when on auto.)

 

If you can see it there, just lower it by 2 notches and test away with small ftts on all the cores for a few hours, no BSOD, lower it again by one and re test until you find the lowest stable voltage. That holds true no matter what your speed, because the lowest voltage makes you get the lowest core temps.

 


Best to do it at night or when you leave for a while, as you want several hours to be sure its stable, then lower, when you reach a point that it fails, up it a notch and let it run all night, 8 hours if possible, and if it bombs out... up it one more and do it again!
Good Luck!

 

--Lupi!


Message edited by Lupiron on 03-14-2008 at 03:50:28 PM
Get out of here...and take your fail with you.
Profile: member

You might also consider a new CPU cooler in addition to lowering voltage.

A Tuniq Tower 120 would be a huge help. It seems to be the tried-and-true choice of many Q6600 overclockers.

Check out this article.

http://www.anandtech.com/casecooli [...] i=3068&p=6


---------------
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 2.68 GHz/1.12v (Stock cooling p'wns!) - Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L - 4 GB A-Data DDR2 800 @ 897 MHz - GeForce 8800 GS (EVGA 384-P3-N851-AR) @ 724/1745/2084 - ASUS Vento mini tower - Seagate 250 GB 7200.10 hdd - Vista Ultimate x64
Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

While the Tuniq tower is excellent, there are better cooler for the price now, especially the Xigmatek: http://www.frostytech.com/articlev [...] cleID=2233

Cheaper and perhaps better, I think this is the way to go.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I'm also OC'ing the Q6600 w/ a Arctic Freezer Pro 7. If you left the voltage setting on auto, your temps seem very reasonable to me. Set the voltage yourself. I'd start with 1.25v and work from there.


Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Heat too high for q6600??? PLS help

Google Ads
Ad
News

Graphics card makers expect Vista to improve profits

Published on September 23, 2005

Windows Vista, Microsoft's next generation OS, is expected to help graphics card makers see increased profits from rising high-end card demand, according to graphics card makers in Taiwan. Read more

Heat concerns slow high-power LED adoption

Published on June 26, 2006

Adoption of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in high brightness panel backlighting applications, such as notebooks and LCD TVs, has been delayed due to overheating issues, according to sources in the Taiwan LED industry. Read more

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

Kingmax Survives with DDR3 to 2000 MHz

Published on January 09, 2008

It's been a while since we've seen any products from Kingmax in our labs, but this long-established performance player is moving forward with the latest high-speed parts. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more