Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Max voltage to CPU
 

Max voltage to CPU

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Max voltage to CPU
 
The only religion is Quantum Physics
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I was looking at Intels processor finder and noticed the following:
(Thermal design) Power: 0.80v - 1.3625v

 

Does this mean that i bust my CPU if i run above 1.3625v?

 

Best regards!


Message edited by Moondrinke r on 03-15-2008 at 01:27:50 PM
Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Any voltage setting above what is specified is sure to damage your CPU, even if you house it in the freezer.  I think the CPU is guaranteed to bust at anything above 1.45-1.5v.

The only religion is Quantum Physics
Profile: journeyman
More Information

badge wrote :

Any voltage setting above what is specified is sure to damage your CPU, even if you house it in the freezer.  I think the CPU is guaranteed to bust at anything above 1.45-1.5v.


 
So i can't take it above 1.3625? I think it was called the Thermal Design Power, though i am not sure.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Well, you can damage your CPU by setting applied voltage near or at the unit's outer limits of capability.  Yes...you can shorten the life and permanently damage the CPU with excessive voltage.


Message edited by badge on 03-15-2008 at 01:36:24 PM
Noob?
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

I'd like to know what processor type you are talking about!
 
--Lupi

Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

The E8xxx's upper limit is 1.3625v while the older 65nm C2D's upper limit is 1.5V. Going above 1.3625V on the 45nm C2D is like going over 1.5V in the 65nm C2D. So short answer, no.
 
If you want to, expect less than 3 years out of the cpu's life.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
The only religion is Quantum Physics
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Evilonigiri wrote :

The E8xxx's upper limit is 1.3625v while the older 65nm C2D's upper limit is 1.5V. Going above 1.3625V on the 45nm C2D is like going over 1.5V in the 65nm C2D. So short answer, no.

 

If you want to, expect less than 3 years out of the cpu's life.

 

But to get to 4ghz on my E8400 i need to get above 1.3625v and thereby damaging my CPU. So basically if i go to 1.4v i'm looking at a fried chip in 2012 if i'm lucky? Damn.
Hmm, thought it could go to 1.4v without worries.

 

Edit, i think i go 3.6ghz now, and when needed i go to 4.0 ghz to increase the lifespan :)
At a point i think i throttled the CPU volt up at 1.3625v (the limit) but never got into windows, did this damage my CPU in anyway? I would like this chip to hold for ATLEAST 3 years! was looking at 4-5 years. hm.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Moondrinke r on 03-15-2008 at 09:44:24 PM
Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Moondrinker wrote :

But to get to 4ghz on my E8400 i need to get above 1.3625v and thereby damaging my CPU.  
Hmm, thought it could go to 1.4v without worries.


Just like how you need 1.6V in the bios to get 4GHz on the Q6600.
 
You can go ahead and do it if you're not gonna keep the cpu for more than 3 years.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
The only religion is Quantum Physics
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Evilonigiri wrote :

Just like how you need 1.6V in the bios to get 4GHz on the Q6600.
 
You can go ahead and do it if you're not gonna keep the cpu for more than 3 years.


 
I guess. :)  
 
well, currently i am not in the need for those extra mhz so i will keep it at 3.5mhz with a bit of tweaking in the voltage. I'm hoping it will last 4 years.
 
Thanks!

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Can I ask, what it's not doing for you at 3.5GHz that 4GHz will?
 
It's good to get as many years out of components as possible, but if keeping your 3.5GHz OC stable requires 1.3625V, then I wouldn't hope for 4-5 years, somehow.  Even if the processor is cooled well enougth, putting more volts through it than it can handle will either kill it outright (as per badge) or severely shorten the lifespan (as per Evilonigiri).
 
By all means, slap on 1000+ sun block and crank up the volts if you're so inclined, but above 1.4V your processor lifespan could very well be measured in seconds (very unfortunate) to probably only months.
 
Try and keep the volts as low as possible for longevity, but high enough for stability.  I'd be happy getting 2-3 years at 3.5GHz.

Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Seabreeze, you have a different viewpoint from others. While you may not need the extra speed, others who does encoding, photoshop, etc. needs the extra speed to save time. A difference of 500MHz is pretty significant, and it will be noticeable in cpu intensive applications.
 
Of course there are others who just want to see how far they can push their system. They are known as OCing enthusiasts, with really no practical use of the extra speed. This is pretty much like any hobby, so they don't need any practical reason to OC.
 
Some intensive cpu game like Supreme Commander will require the extra speed for it to be playable. I had to OC my Q6600 from stock 2.6GHz to 3.15GHz just to be able to play the game a little smoother, but the game still slows down tons in the later part.
 
I doubt 1.4V will shorten the cpu life to months, what makes you say this? The E8400 are quite new, so there isn't any people with OCed E8400 dying on them due to high voltage.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman

Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Max voltage to CPU
 

Google Ads
Ad
Related Content