True. You won't really know until you try to replicate the problem again sometime with a less crucial drive. I was just speculating that the event that took out the C: drive effected the G: drive as well. The new partition size is right in the range of the limitation for FAT32 partition sizes, so I was curious.
I am wondering about that appearant partition size change. Unless the OneTouch did indeed do something on its own accord, your partition size might still really be the original size. Take this statement into consideration (it is copier from the website with citation to the original poster:
IDE hard disks that are larger than 128 GB use 48-bit logical block addressing
John Fullbright posted on Friday, April 13, 2007 6:40 PM
IDE hard disks that are larger than 128 GB use 48-bit logical block
addressing (LBA) as defined in the ATA/ATAPI-6 specification. If the system
BIOS for the computer does not support 48-bit LBA, the BIOS will report a
capacity for the hard disk that is equal to 128 GB.
Look for a setting in your computer's bios to set the type as 48 bit lba.
If your bios does not support 48 bit lba, udate your computer's bios.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/327202/en-us
I don't know if your hdd is SATA or IDE, but the BIOS angle is something to consider.
What is the verdict on your desktop PC. Are you going to repair it with a new C: drive? If so, it would be real interesting to see if your G: drive (reinstalled in the desktop) would be seen as its original size again (assuming the tech shop didn't also play with the partitioning and formatting).