First of all, I did not even realize that it was possible to overclock a motherboard but anyway, would there be a significant increase in performance by overclocking RAM and motherboard? If I have a q6600 1:1 overclock at 3.0 GHz, how big of a difference would I see if I were to overclock my RAM to 1000 from 800 and/or my motherboard? The gigabyte DS3L's specs say 1333/1066 MHz, so I don't even really know what it is running at.
Truthfully, you won't see a diff in real world applications and games, as long as the timings for the ram is set accordingly. According to Anandtech, there is absolutely no difference in high or low fsb speeds except in benchmarks.
------------------------------"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri
So what your saying is that you don't see any performance gain by over clocking? I beg to differ and I think you might get a lot of conflicting replies. I took my CPU from 2.4 to 3.6 and I can tell you that I see a definite difference in performance. With that said I will sit back and watch this thread...should be interesting. BTW, there is an overclocking guide in these forums. I would read that and come back with any questions.
I took my CPU from 2.4 to 3.6 and I can tell you that I see a definite difference in performance.
Yeah, I plan to oc my q6600 too. I was referring more to the memory and motherboard and how much performance is gained by overclocking those components.
So what your saying is that you don't see any performance gain by over clocking? I beg to differ and I think you might get a lot of conflicting replies. I took my CPU from 2.4 to 3.6 and I can tell you that I see a definite difference in performance. With that said I will sit back and watch this thread...should be interesting. BTW, there is an overclocking guide in these forums. I would read that and come back with any questions.
Apparently you didn't read the first post. The OP's question was talking about the ram and fsb while you are talking about cpus.
Perhaps I should have made myself clearer. What I meant was the diff in performance of 10 x 300MHz = 3GHz and 9 x 333MHz = 3GHz. According to Anandtech, there is no difference in real world applications between the higher fsb and the lower fsb. Thus it's better to have the lower fsb with the higher multiplier.
Likewise, ram that's rated at 200MHz with CAS 2 is as fast as 400MHz with CAS 4. As long as the timings are set accordingly, there should be no difference.
------------------------------"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri
Well, if you overclock the ram, usually you have to loosen the timing at the same time, which sets back part of the speed gain.
As for overclocking FSB, if you raise it, your cpu clock will rise. Of course that'll have an impact. Or are you talk about just raising FSB without ocing cpu? How would that work? Raising FSB and decrease multiplier? What would be the point of that?
yeah i read graysky's article on overclocking, which led to my last post, but i guess I did not catch whether the FSB was for the cpu or the motherboard
The FSB is the bus for cpu, memory and board. everything basically runs off this bus and you have to adjust accordingly. I guess I was under the impression you were overclocking everything.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.