Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

Zero Energy LED Media Wall Lights Up Beijing

Published on May 19, 2008

The upcoming 2008 Olympic Games are inspiring some show-stopping buildings and technologies, among them the Greenpix Zero Energy Media Wall by New York based architecture & media firm Simone Giostra & Partners. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Intel's 180° turnaround produces Pentium M 745

Published on March 24, 2004

Intel has its back against the wall fighting the challenges to maintain adequate and affordable thermal control of its processors. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in a show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

For the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 hit wall after 3.4ghz.
 

Q6600 hit wall after 3.4ghz.




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 hit wall after 3.4ghz.
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Specs:
COOLER MASTER Centurion 5 CAC
Antec earthwatts EA500
GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3L
Q6600 GO, VID=1.25
Xigmatek HDT S1283 (replaced Arctic Freezer Pro)
Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800
BFG Tech GeForce 8800GTS (G92) 512MB

I got it stable at 3.3ghz@1.35vcore (ran Small FFT's for 8.5 hr's before I shut it off)
3.4ghz@1.4v seems okay. Ran Small FFT for 30 min and 3Dmark06. Will run this tonight to verify that it's stable.

But once I go to 3.45ghz or higher, it crashes usually within a few minutes regardless of vcore (I tried all the way up to 1.5v). It crashes like clockwork.

Could it be the FSB can't handle anything higher than ~380mhz? Do I need to tweak the FSB voltage?

I didn't list the temps but they're all fine. At 1.5v the cores are getting close to 70C, not great but not reason for crashing right? There is one strange thing with the core temps (even on stable OC). They'll heat up to a max value (example 65C), and then immediately fall ~7C. Sometimes they'll stay at the new low level for ~hr, sometimes they'll climb back up and fall again repeatedly. Only the 2 hottest cores do this. The other 2 will stay constant (+/- 1C).
With the Freezer Pro, the hottest cores were always 0 and 1.
With the Xigmatek, the hottest cores are always 0 and 3.



Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

I increased the FSB voltage by 0.2v It booted (3.5ghz@1.45v). I'm running small FFT now (no failures for 10min). I dunno if it's stable, but it's definitely better. It wouldn't even boot before.

By the way, increasing the northbridge voltage (MCH) by .1v seemed to have no positive effect. it crashed (3.5ghz@1.5v) before loading windows.

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Hmmm. Havent I seen alot of people using that board? I am pretty sure it should go over 380.

You need to make sure your NB is at 1.4 for 400, watch your CPU PLL Voltage, Give it at least .1 over the VCore. So if your VCore is 1.40, make it 1.5, or 1.6.

FSB Termination voltage needs to be somewhere near 1.50 as well.

Believe it or not, I have something of a similar problem. At 3.8, I always bomb out when Prime goes to switch from 1st pass test 3 to 4. KBooom! No matter the VCore. From 1.5 where it should/is stable. To 1.6. No effect.

However, I have never crashed, not one time at this speed, and my daily core temps stay well in the 50c unless I test stuff. The TRUE is impressive!

--Lupi

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

just bump all the volt by +0.1V that should be good for what you running at.what is your temp at 3.4 anyway?

Profile: journeyman
More Information

What is PLL voltage? Where do I change that?

The P35-DS3L has:
FSB (+.1, +.2, +.3)
MCH (Northbridge) options are +.1, +.2, +.3
CPU voltage control

I don't know where to set FSB termination voltage either...

Temps at 3.4 are ~59C stressed.

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

yeah thats the two voltage.both +1 and the temp you got allow you another 14C to play with.

i guess you can do 3.6G easily with 1.475V or maybe less,ram 2.1V 4-4-4-15 800Mhz,NB+FSB +0.2V SB+0.1V

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

if you dont know just +0.2V every option available.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Houston we've achieved stability!

3.5ghz@1.475v
FSB +.2
MCH +.1
Cores are 65, 65, 63, 65
Small FFT for 7hr 20min (and still running while I type)

Problem is I made 3 changes at once:
1. I updated the bios to version f7 (i'm not messing w/ any beta version)
2. I set MCH at +.1
3. I increased the vcore from 1.45 to 1.475

I don't know which one made the difference. Guess I'll try for 3.6ghz and find out.

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

set it to 3.6.what fsp you running at?389x9?i would ant +0.2 to MCH!you temp is too safe.set the Vcore to 1.5V just dont let the temp of the core go above 75C.


understand?

Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

While Compu's guide says the max temp is 75C for the Q6600 G0, I think it's better if you stay below 65C. This is because the extra heat might make the NB/SB/vidcard too hot.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Glad to see ya got it cranking. You will not get much more heat to hit 3.6, so that part is good!

While people recommend keeping the FSB lower, by using the x 9 multi, the higher the FSB, the higher you can sync your RAM. I would recommend also looking for any info on fsb holes for that board. Sometimes you cant pull off a 400 fsb, but 405 will work, hehe. Thats just how it goes.

But, as you have seen, all that trial and error is the best! Get some quality time sticking your fingers around in your computer, and all over her keys!

Gotta have that quality time to get to know her, inside and out!

Haha!

--Lupi


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 hit wall after 3.4ghz.

Go to:
 

Google Ads