What card for Supreme Commander at 1920 x 1200?

I'm in the process of putting together a new computer. I've ordered all the parts already, except for the graphics card.

Highlights of the rig:

Q6600 with Zalman 9700

P6N Diamond

4 x 1Gb Crucial PC2-6400

2 x 150Gb Raptor

LG 24" (L245WP-BN)

Now the game I'm most interested in is Supreme Commander. Originally I was going to get a GTX, but now the GT is out and I was going to go for that.

I recently read that Nvidia is going to release a new GTS on the 3rd of December but the specs vary wildly depending on which site you read. Can anyone tell me if one GT will be enough to run Supreme Commander at the highest detail settings at 1920 x 1200, do I need 2 in SLI or is it worth waiting for the new GTS (since the GT is out of stock everywhere anyways...)?????

single 8800GTX will kick any games fps right outta the map. Except for Crysis

nope, if u turn off the AA (which wont make a noticeable difference) u will be fine with crysis

You didn't say what resolution you're playing at. On my old PC, I play Supreme Commander on an E6400 and an overclocked 7900GS. It runs absolutely fine with everything on high. However, that is at 1280 x 1024.......

And the new GTS will have a higher bandwidth. Oh wait, it wont! It still has 256bit!

That because it doesnt matter about bandiwith atm since other factors are more important. SLI'd 8800GT's will be 100% fine. If you want go for some EVGA 8800GT KO's or some other memory overclocked card if you are worried about bandwidth. There is absolutly no way SLI'ed or even single 8800GTX's are worth it even more anyone who reccomends it to you probably wouldnt ever consider buying it thereselves.

Evilonigi i what kind of 16x aa? Beacuse if you mean super sampling AA you are losing tons of FPS for no reason since it works no more effectivly then 4x SSAA w/ 4x MSAA, which is also 16z AA and gives MUCH better performance, not that any of that matters since 4x SSAA alone is fine for perfect quality image.

If you are using 16x AA though and wasting that performance its no wonder your game slows down so much at just 2500 units, for a quad and 8800gts that's nothing.

play with 8x. No aa in really noticable when i look at big scenes

i played supreme commander but with lower resolution (7x12) with highest detail. never got any kind of lag. n frame rate was good (tho i didnt measure it). but it was smooth. u can c my sig for my system.

well i didnt mean AA isnt noticeable in all situations but in most situations u wont see a noticeable difference, however because my monitor supports up to 1680x1050 , i cant say anything about 1920x1200 , also as u know the best
FPS/PERFORMANCE AA is 4x (if u dont use 0) and i think with 1920x1200 +4x AA , a 8800GTX will not have any difficulties(again , u have to ask someone who has played it @ 1920x1200 )

Single GTS 640mb at 1920 x 1200 all high settings plays Crysis just fine at 25 fps...Just for your reference flyingdutchman. The new GTS SSC 640mb is even better for the money if you dont want to spend $500 on a GTX...

My roommate plays supreme commander at 1440x900 with a geforceGo 6800, 1Gb of ram, and a 2ghz Pentium M.

Im inclined to believe that aa Q6600 and 8800gt would be more than enough