Is 800 speed ram necesary or would it be wise to get the 667 with lower timings? Please consider no overclocking will be involved.
Also... can someone clarify, in a nutshell, the main difference between 667/800 & if any speed above 800 is actually faster?
------------------------------Thermaltake LanBox; ASUS P5E-VM mATX; Intel Core 2 Duo E8400/3GHz; 4096MB OCZ Reaper [4-4-4-15]; 300GB VelociRaptor; ATi Radeon HD 4870 512MB; X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty; Acer G24 Gaming Monitor; PC Power & Cooling 750W; Alienware® Ozma 7™ Headphones; XP Pro
------------------------------Thermaltake LanBox; ASUS P5E-VM mATX; Intel Core 2 Duo E8400/3GHz; 4096MB OCZ Reaper [4-4-4-15]; 300GB VelociRaptor; ATi Radeon HD 4870 512MB; X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty; Acer G24 Gaming Monitor; PC Power & Cooling 750W; Alienware® Ozma 7™ Headphones; XP Pro
Reply to mychael616
Actually, is it better to have the increased bandwidth or faster timings? That was the second part of the question.
------------------------------Thermaltake LanBox; ASUS P5E-VM mATX; Intel Core 2 Duo E8400/3GHz; 4096MB OCZ Reaper [4-4-4-15]; 300GB VelociRaptor; ATi Radeon HD 4870 512MB; X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty; Acer G24 Gaming Monitor; PC Power & Cooling 750W; Alienware® Ozma 7™ Headphones; XP Pro
Reply to mychael616
The extra performance by running the memory at 800 is not worth much, unless you are overclocking. The better timings by running the 800 at 667 are worth it in your case possibly.
I would compare the timings of both at 667. Then make your choice.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.