Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Core 2 Duo vs. Dual Core

Core 2 Duo vs. Dual Core

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs Core 2 Duo vs. Dual Core

Word :    Username :           
 
- 0 +

What is the difference(s) between CORE 2 DUO vs. DUAL CORE?

Moderator Edit: Don't type thread titles in all caps!

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by randoMIZER on 05-17-2009 at 06:32:23 AM
Reply to JPT1
Register or log in to remove.

Core 2 Duo is the second gen of Dual core. People just abbreviate it now to Dual Core.

------------------------------ HP 2207 22" Monitor, AMD 6400+, 8800gt SC 2x2gb G-Skill DDR2 800, GIGABYTE MA78gm 160gb Sata WD,
OCZ 600w PS,
Razer Tarantula Logitech MX518.
Reply to Underbyte18
- 0 +

U mean Pentium D vs Core2Duo ?
well if u mean this then one word : Core2Duo Destroys the Pentium D

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar

Dual Core means what looks like a single CPU on the outside actually contains two seperate processors on the inside. Quad Cores contain 4 cores. These all fit into a single socket.

There are a large number of "Dual Core" processors on the market.
The "Core 2 Duo" is one of these and is the fastest.

Both Intel and AMD have been making Dual Core processors for a few years now.

Reply to zenmaster
- 1 +

Core 2 Duo is just Intel's name for their dual core processors. They are based on Intel's Core microarchitecture, as opposed to their previous Netburst, and are currently the fastest chips available.

------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
Reply to ausch30

Hey guys, I'm not sure about this, but I think the OP is referring to the E2XXX series, the ones based off the Allendale core. They are listed in a separate section of "dual-core" under Newegg's search feature, so that might be what he is thinking of.
@OP: if that be the case, then the only difference is that the L2 cache on the E2XXX is 1MB, whereas the E4XXX series have 2MB.

Reply to Avenger_K
- 0 +

quantumsheep wrote :

and the E6*** has 4mb!

 

The E6300 and E6400 have 2mb but the rest have 4mb

------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
Reply to ausch30

There are new "Dual Core" CPUs from Intel. They consist of the E2xx and T2xx family. The official family name is "IntelĀ® PentiumĀ® dual-core processor".

http://www.intel.com/products/proc [...] l-core.htm

Reply to blackened144
- 0 +

Though try and be a little careful with the names, especually when looking at notebooks. Quite easy to read Core Duo instead of Core 2 Duo, and not all dual cores are the same.

Reply to womble

That's the way I took it...

Reply to TurdBurglar
- 0 +

ausch30 wrote :

The E6300 and E6400 have 2mb but the rest have 4mb



Actually the 6320 and 6420 have 4MB.

Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 Conroe 2.13GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor

:D

Reply to Grimmy

Wow, I think the OP just needs to go to Intel's website and check out the processor families. The lineup includes CPUs with 1mb, 2mb, and 4mb L2 cache sizes with various FSB speeds as well. Check it out.

------------------------------ Q6600 @ 3.2ghz w/ Tuniq Tower 120 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L |
2gb Super Talent PC6400 | BFG 8800GT OC 512mb (740/1854/1980) w/ Accelero S1 Turbo |
Corsair 450VX PSU | Cooler Master Elite 330 Case | Windows XP Pro | 3dMark06 14,716
Reply to TurdBurglar
- 0 +

JPT1 wrote :

What is the difference(s) between CORE 2 DUO vs. DUAL CORE?



Whelp:

Intel Core 2

Pentium D

The both contain 2 cores (processors) in a single package like Zenmaster pointed out, and the Pentium D is a predecessor, which is something to stay away from... Unless you need to warm up a room during those cold winter nites. :whistle:

Reply to Grimmy

Old pentium Ds have been discontinued and the new ones are based on the conroe chips but have crippled cache. So the code name is allendale.

Reply to roadrunner197069

intel is just dumb with their naming conventions.

Core 2 Dual Core Quad Oct 4 Quad Duo-Duo???

But at this point it doesnt matter. Hell, they could name their cpus "monkeybutt" and they would still sell.

Reply to shadowmaster625
- 0 +

Grimmy wrote :

Actually the 6320 and 6420 have 4MB.

 

Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 Conroe 2.13GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor

 

:D

 


 


Grimmy with all due respect that's why I said E6300 and E6400 because all the other E6*** models have 4MB but those two are 2MB. Not that there is any reason to buy either of them anymore since the E6750 is about $11 more than the E6300.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by ausch30 on 11-28-2007 at 09:05:10 PM
------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
Reply to ausch30
- 0 +

ausch30 wrote :

Grimmy with all due respect that's why I said E6300 and E6400 because all the other E6*** models have 4MB but those two are 2MB. Not that there is any reason to buy either of them anymore since the E6750 is about $11 more than the E6300.

 

Well, I was just mentioning that there are 4M chips, it's just it has the #20 in them. So don't freak out, I wasn't trying to correct ya.

 

Actually the 6750 is 10 bucks cheaper then the 6420 on newegg.

 

:lol:. o O (wonder is intel is thinking, crap our nose is bleeding, I know, we'll cut our neck, dat should do it)

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Grimmy on 11-28-2007 at 09:32:50 PM
Reply to Grimmy
- 0 +

Grimmy wrote :

Well, I was just mentioning that there are 4M chips, it's just it has the #20 in them. So don't freak out, I wasn't trying to correct ya.

 

Actually the 6750 is 10 bucks cheaper then the 6420 on newegg.

 

:lol:. o O (wonder is intel is thinking, crap our nose is bleeding, I know, we'll cut our neck, dat should do it)

 

It's interesting though because if you look at the user comments on Newegg there is a review for the E6300 from a guy on 11/17/07 who's had ownership for 1 day - 1 week, there really are some people out there still buying these chips.

------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
Reply to ausch30
- 0 +

Heh, as long as the MB doesn't support 1333fsb, I can see perhaps getting the 6300/6320/6400/6420... but if it does support 1333fsb, thats just darn right crazy.

Reply to Grimmy

ausch30 wrote :

It's interesting though because if you look at the user comments on Newegg there is a review for the E6300 from a guy on 11/17/07 who's had ownership for 1 day - 1 week, there really are some people out there still buying these chips.



What if you dont have a board that supports 1333fsb then you cant get the e6750, and the e6300 might be the go.

------------------------------ "This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman
- 0 +

I guess your right, I just think that it's likely people that don't know any better.


Message edited by ausch30 on 11-29-2007 at 06:58:06 PM
------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
Reply to ausch30

also a good point

------------------------------ "This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Reply to chookman
- 0 +

Thanks for all the help and info. I guess I should have been more specific. I was inquiring about the structural differences, and if there was a structural difference, was one considered a true dual processor and the other not?
It appears that there is really not a difference other than calling the newer version (of the same product) something different.

Reply to JPT1

From a CPU standpoint, there's no difference in processing power between a dual core and a core 2 duo at the same clock speed. Only difference is dual core has less L2 cache. Here's sandra copy/paste from my two laptops, one w/ a c2d and another w/ a dual core.

Dell 1525 w/ core 2 duo and 2 gb ram:

Benchmark Results
Dhrystone ALU : 15.50GIPS
Whetstone iSSE3 : 12.32GFLOPS
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Windows Experience Index
Current Processor(s) : 4.9
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Performance vs. Speed
Dhrystone ALU : 7.77MIPS/MHz
Whetstone iSSE3 : 6.18MFLOPS/MHz
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Performance vs. Power
Processor(s) Power : 26.90W
Dhrystone ALU : 576.06MIPS/W
Whetstone iSSE3 : 458.10MFLOPS/W
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Performance Test Status
Run ID : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5750 @ 2.00GHz (2C, 2.00GHz,
2MB L2, 664MHz FSB)
Platform Compliance : x86
NUMA Support : No
SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmark : Yes
Total Test Threads : 2
Multi-Core Test : Yes
Cores per Processor : 2
SMT (Multi-Threaded) Benchmark : No
Processor Affinity : P0C0T0 P0C1T0
System Timer : 14.32MHz
Number of Runs : 64000 / 640

Processor
Model : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5750 @ 2.00GHz
Speed : 2.00GHz
Cores per Processor : 2 Unit(s)
Type : Mobile, Dual-Core
Internal Data Cache : 2x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size
L2 On-board Cache : 2MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line
size, 2 threads sharing


Dell 1525 w/ dual core and 3 gb RAM


Benchmark Results
Dhrystone ALU : 15.49GIPS
Whetstone iSSE3 : 12.77GFLOPS
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Windows Experience Index
Current Processor(s) : 4.9
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Performance vs. Speed
Dhrystone ALU : 7.77MIPS/MHz
Whetstone iSSE3 : 6.40MFLOPS/MHz
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Performance vs. Power
Processor(s) Power : 26.90W
Dhrystone ALU : 575.95MIPS/W
Whetstone iSSE3 : 474.80MFLOPS/W
Results Interpretation : Higher index values are better.

Performance Test Status
Run ID : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T3200 @ 2.00GHz (2C, 2.00GHz,
1MB L2, 664MHz FSB)
Platform Compliance : x86
NUMA Support : No
SMP (Multi-Processor) Benchmark : Yes
Total Test Threads : 2
Multi-Core Test : Yes
Cores per Processor : 2
SMT (Multi-Threaded) Benchmark : No
Processor Affinity : P0C0T0 P0C1T0
System Timer : 14.32MHz
Number of Runs : 64000 / 640

Processor
Model : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T3200 @ 2.00GHz
Speed : 2.00GHz
Cores per Processor : 2 Unit(s)
Type : Mobile, Dual-Core
Internal Data Cache : 2x 32kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 8-way, 64 byte line size
L2 On-board Cache : 1MB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 4-way, 64 byte line
size, 2 threads sharing

Reply to webazoid

hi how i represent my presentation for core 2 Duo vs. Dual Core
can u give me a report on it?


Message edited by kavita_77 on 02-07-2009 at 05:09:30 PM
Reply to kavita_77
- 0 +

Basicly intel have messed up. For example, the E5200 is Dual Core, BUT with the new 45 nm technology, like core 2 quad. Most, or many core 2 duo use 65 nm, and generate more heat and use more power.
It also has 2 MB of L2 cache and runs at 2.5Ghz. And half the price of a core 2 duo at 2.5Ghz.

SO, I don't think a core 2 duo, with twice the price is twice the better.

Besides, this clocks easy up to 3.5 - 4 Ghz ;D

Reply to meramos

A lot of this confusion has been created due to intel using similar names for 2 processors that are quite different. I have been breaking my head for quite sometime over this issue. Got some clarity after reading the . http://binaryday.com/2009/01/15/di [...] pentium-d/. Quite useful for technically challenged people like me :)

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Ummm no...

He has PentiumD and Core2 right, but the Pentium Dual-Core is just a brandname for lower-end Core2 chips.

Reply to B-Unit
- 0 +

I know, but if it already has 4+ responses by the time I get there,I consider it resurrected.

Reply to B-Unit

PsychoSaysdie wrote :

C2D > PDC

3.8Ghz PDC > 2.6Ghz C2D

Too many factor's to take into account but if you have a 2.0-3.0Ghz PDC and are looking to upgrade. The C2D is the way to go. If you have a 3.6-3.8Ghz PDC i'd look for a way to get to 4Ghz and maybe call it a day.


Er... PDC is pretty much the same as a C2D. Take away some cache, VT and usually a little clock speed and you're left with a PDC. If you're looking to upgrade you'd be better to move to a C2Q for some tangible performance improvements.

Now if you're talking about a PD it's a different story.

Somebody post a necro card.

Reply to randoMIZER
- 0 +

Bout like a 65nm Core2 @1.6-1.8Ghz

Reply to B-Unit
- 0 +

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipse [...] =2795&p=14

 

I should probably have said 'at best' on the end.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by B-Unit on 05-17-2009 at 07:58:38 AM
Reply to B-Unit
- 0 +

Can some1 pls answer it in bullet form please? Compare major performance parameters of these 2 chips and their prices as well.

That link given by anonymous to http://binaryday.com/2009/01/15/di [...] pentium-d/ was helpful but too verbose I will say

Reply to sita

pentium dual core and core 2 duo has the same microarchitecture. pdc e5xxx line is better than the whole core 2 duo e4xxx line.

Reply to BruceOTB

OMG whats with all the sudden Necro posts?! Did everyone get bored of answering all the new posts or what?!

Reply to Gin Fushicho

You forgot the Celeron Dual Core, and technically AMD's dual cores as well.

Reply to loneninja

Difference between Dual Core vs Core 2 Duo vs Pentium D explained in details at
http://www.ialwayscapital.com/2009/07/difference-between-intel-core-2-duo-vs.html


Message edited by ialwayscapital on 07-22-2009 at 02:35:53 AM
Reply to ialwayscapital

what kind of parallel system design is used in dual core and core 2?

Reply to Anonymous

Core 2 Duo is likely 15-30% faster than a Dual core at same speed. That resume all.
Core 2 Duo has better cache, better energy administration, less heat.
Core 2 Duo is a refined Dual Core.
Pentium D is history....

Reply to kakanutto

kakanutto wrote :

Core 2 Duo is likely 15-30% faster than a Dual core at same speed. That resume all.
Core 2 Duo has better cache, better energy administration, less heat.
Core 2 Duo is a refined Dual Core.
Pentium D is history....



Read the thread date dude...

Reply to Bluescreendeath

Closed by fihart

Reply to Anonymous
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Core 2 Duo vs. Dual Core
Go to:

There are 1794 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
CPU fan
By mocchan, 1 hour ago:

Your case has a cut out for a backplate to be installed, so you SHOULD be fine installing...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts