Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > R700 or Nvidia 9800?

R700 or Nvidia 9800?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - R700 or Nvidia 9800?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Which one will be more powerful?


 
0 %
      0 vote
R700
 
0 %
      0 vote
Nvidia 9000
 
0 %
      0 vote
Intel GMA X4500

All : 0 vote (0 blank vote)
Poll with 3 possible answers.

This poll is closed, you cannot vote

Word :    Username :           
 
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

ill go wid nvidia 9800..

Reply to stonecold91

3DFX

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w179/random1301/3dfx.jpg

http://fuse.superglue.se/pwned.jpg

------------------------------ http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w179/random1301/1224237394448br8.jpg http://nocleanfeed.com/nocensorship.gif
Reply to randomizer

When do these cards come out?

Reply to fonzy

I'm very curious to see what ATI comes up with in the next few months. That being said, I'm leaning heavily toward the 98 hundo.

------------------------------ "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Reply to JJBlanche

If its anything like G92 vs RV670, then 9800 will be high end, and R700 being a little lower in price, and having near equal performance.

I will put my money on 9800, after 7800 and 8800 destroyed what ATi had at those times. But ATi may come back with something like the X1950

Reply to kingoftherings

Who knows, maybe ATI can pull another 9-series thing out of their hat and nVidia will launch another FX series, maybe the opposite will happen, you can't really tell yet.

Reply to Gravemind123

I don't know, but with Intel joining the race, I can't wait to see the price wars :D
James

Reply to james_8970

I heard intel is going to leave the "enthusiast" market to ATI/nVidia

------------------------------ "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Reply to JJBlanche

oops!! looks like I screwed up the poll when I made it.
Actually Intel is trying to comeback on the enthusiast level but, they'll never get there in time.

Reply to aznstriker92

i really wanna go with ati on this one. something tells me that they have something up their sleeves. my logic tells me to go with nvidia. who knows though...maybe r700 will spank nvidia.

------------------------------ Q6600 @ 3.6GHz|2GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer|DFI P965-S Dark|8800GT 512MB|Raptor Main Drive|Audigy X-Fi (Modded)|Rocketfish Case with H2O|

AMD Athlon X2 4800+ @ 2.7GHz|OCZ Golden Gamer @ 450MHz 2.5-3-2-5, 1T|250GB Main Drive|2900XT|NZXT Zero w/ h2o
Reply to lambofgode3x

Too early to tell, but my bet would be on nvidia, they simply have more resources and time for the better flagship. That said, R700 should be very strong, most likely 2-3x faster than RV670.

Intel also will be powerful player, but not this year, probably will compete with R800 and whatever nVidia gen at that time.

Reply to Harrisson

When do these come out??? I'm hoping something good for January.

Reply to zodiacboyscorp

zodiacboyscorp wrote :

When do these come out??? I'm hoping something good for January.


No new gen in January, or Q1 2008, only R680 and D8E. R700 should come out next summer at best, no info at all about nvidia.

Reply to Harrisson

I think NVIDIA will win the next round again. But certainly it is anybody's game at this point... What's most interesting to me, is that NV just went to 65nm tech, while ATI skipped ahead to 55nm.. Could that be a great advantage for ATI? Certainly it didn't help the 3870 beat the 8800GT, but if done right next time.....

Or will NV's next products also be 55nm or smaller? Perhaps even 45nm? Huff huff huff huff!!!!

OH LORD! I am getting technically aroused again!! Think books..... magazines..... old cars..... regular season baseball games..... reading...... boring........ Ahhh..... that was a close call. =0

Reply to gamebro

Wheres Matrox in the poll?

Reply to vincio_filiarum

whats going to be new in the 9800 series? 5xxx had dx9, 6xxx had good dx9, 7xxx had hdr, 8xxx had dx10, whats 9xxx going 2 have?

------------------------------ why have sex when u can play computer games?!?
Reply to thepinkpanther

With the way AMD/ATI is going R700 might turn into another mid-range card that performs right below the 3850 and the 9800 would become a 8600GTX!

------------------------------ Q9400 @3.2Ghz-HD4870 512MB GDDR5-2GB DDR2-1066
"You figured it out. All new CPU's are nothing but overclocked Pentium 1's with a few bells and whistles added, ask any ol timer whose been around."

 

Reply to bfellow

lambofgode3x wrote :

i really wanna go with ati on this one. something tells me that they have something up their sleeves. (snip).



hmmmfff, where have I heard that before? ...up their sleeves, what they need to do is pull their heads out of their ass... :pfff:

------------------------------ Evga X58 3XSLI : i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz :GTX295+ x 2 :12GB XMS3 Dominator 8-8-8-21 1600 :XFi Fatal1ty:150GB WD VelociRaptor: 150GB Raptor: 4TB WD 32MB x4: Monsoon Vigor III: Lian Li P80 (black): BFG 1Kw PS: 37" Westinghouse 1080p 8ms :Vista64bit
Reply to warezme

Are these both going to have cell processing on it. A while back that is what I heard for the R700. Like, they will have multiple versions. The low end will only have a few cores on it and the top end will have up to 16 i think.... I am not sure if this is true or not, but its what I remember hearing a few months back.

------------------------------ And on the third day, God created the Remington bolt-action rifle, so that Man could fight the dinosaurs. And the homosexuals.
Reply to spaztic7

Cell processing, by my understanding, was a flop.

------------------------------ "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Reply to JJBlanche

For what it's worth. Digitimes says Feb for the Nvidia 9 series high end and June midrange.

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20071129PD216.html

Reply to m3d

I think the Intel one was put there as a joke... but at some point the sleeping giant might finally wake up and crank out a REAL video card of its own (I refuse to count the i740 as a REAL video card) Beware of Larrabee!

Reply to rodney_ws

I vote to get what your system is made for,

for x38,p35--ati is the way to go for crossfire
680, 780,--nvidia b/c of sli.

I always begin with a mobo that I like, buy the best card out, then upgrade to two of those cards when the price drops later on.

------------------------------ "When people agree with me, I always think that I am wrong" Oscar Wilde
Reply to echofoxtrot

JJBlanche wrote :

Cell processing, by my understanding, was a flop.



I guess the PS3 proved it. It's a great idea but does not work so well in reality. I was just woundering if that was still what was planned.


Message edited by spaztic7 on 11-30-2007 at 09:29:21 PM
------------------------------ And on the third day, God created the Remington bolt-action rifle, so that Man could fight the dinosaurs. And the homosexuals.
Reply to spaztic7

I do bet that Intel is aiming squarely at the high-end.
Intel aint gonna beg nVidia to officially allow SLi on Intel chipsets, so they will be at least faster/better than nVidia just to piss em off and Intel doesnt need nVidia for anything at all.
Next thing is that they DEFINITELY WILL NOT want to be slower than AMD, for obvious reasons.
So Intel will either be "good" or better than both. Prolly not right ahead with their first GPU, but 2-3 years should be enough experience for them.

Reply to Ycon

Ycon wrote :

I do bet that Intel is aiming squarely at the high-end.
Intel aint gonna beg nVidia to officially allow SLi on Intel chipsets, so they will be at least faster/better than nVidia just to piss em off and Intel doesnt need nVidia for anything at all.
Next thing is that they DEFINITELY WILL NOT want to be slower than AMD, for obvious reasons.
So Intel will either be "good" or better than both. Prolly not right ahead with their first GPU, but 2-3 years should be enough experience for them.


IMO Intel's priority will be mainstream - they already conquered low-end, now need middle, and by having both they'll have most of the money flow in the gpu market. High-end will definately will be a goal too, not because its really needed (<5% of the market is WAY less important than the rest 95%), but because they can. I agree first Larabee refresh wont be the killer for nvidia/AMD, but after several generations it might be.

Reply to Harrisson

Read up on the Larabee - mainstream. Too bad, the two giants could loose some weight from sweating a bit.
I'd vote for nV. Genericaly, nV have started the nex-gen and ATi finishes it with an "oh yeah? Well suck on this bohemith energy sucking frame thrower". ATi seems to be playing with impressions, stealing the "nex-gen" ice breaker with the 3870 imo. Frankly, I don't think they have much up thier sleeves... ;)


Message edited by blacken on 11-30-2007 at 10:48:30 PM
Reply to blacken

I vote AMD.I believe the R680(dual gpu) is a test bed for AMD before they go all out.Nvidia droping there 9 series speaks volumes to whats coming from AMD.R700 will have 1-4 45nm gpu per card.With the race getting this hot ,it might take 2-3yrs for Larabee but with alot of money.Intel should have bought ATI when they had the chance.They are about to pay for that mistake.

Reply to ro3dog

spaztic7 wrote :

Are these both going to have cell processing on it. A while back that is what I heard for the R700. Like, they will have multiple versions. The low end will only have a few cores on it and the top end will have up to 16 i think.... I am not sure if this is true or not, but its what I remember hearing a few months back.


From where I read, the R700 is supposed to be multichip or multicore.

Reply to aznstriker92
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > R700 or Nvidia 9800?
Go to:

There are 1229 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them