I have a Q6600 G0. I've noticed the VID as reported by CPUZ is 1.3125 which sounds like its one of the highest you could expect from a G0. I thought B3's where usually that high. So my question is does this mean that I got a CPU that needs more voltage to stay stable? If so that might mean a hotter chip and it would be harder to over clock. OR, maybe it means that the chip can handle more voltage and it's a good thing?, but I doubt that.
I read VID is the voltage Intel guarantees the chip to run stable at stock speed. So I'd think a lower VID would be better. I read somewhere that you can raise the voltage 15% beyond the VID. If that's true, then I'd be able to go to 1.509v max. I wouldn't really want to do that as it sounds high. From what most people are saying, about 1.44v to get 3.6ghz.
Does anyone have an idea of whether VID matters that much, and if it's better to be lower (or higher?) Thanks.
(asus pk5-e wifi, Q6600 G0, tuniq tower, as5, ocz pc6400, antec 900)
I read VID is the voltage Intel guarantees the chip to run stable at stock speed. So I'd think a lower VID would be better. I read somewhere that you can raise the voltage 15% beyond the VID. If that's true, then I'd be able to go to 1.509v max. I wouldn't really want to do that as it sounds high. From what most people are saying, about 1.44v to get 3.6ghz.
Does anyone have an idea of whether VID matters that much, and if it's better to be lower (or higher?) Thanks.
(asus pk5-e wifi, Q6600 G0, tuniq tower, as5, ocz pc6400, antec 900)