Ad
News

Core 2 Duo processors now included in Tom's Hardware's CPU charts

Published on August 21, 2006

Tom's Hardware has updated its interactive CPU charts with the latest processors from Intel and AMD. Read more

Tom's Hardware launches updated Interactive VGA Charts

Published on August 28, 2006

Tom's Hardware has updated its popular VGA Charts that allow readers to compare the performance and value of two graphics cards in various benchmark disciplines side by side. Read more

AMD Sees Improved RV670 Yields; To Launch Radeon HD 3850 X2 In May

Published on March 27, 2008

AMD is expected to grow its penetration in the mainstream graphics card market after seeing a meaningful cost down thanks to improved yields for its RV670 series chips, according to industry sources. Read more

Tom's Hardware adds price/performance ratio to CPU Charts

Published on April 04, 2006

Tom's Hardware will publish a major update to its popular CPU Charts utility on Wednesday. Two new processors will be joining the existing lineup of 83 CPUs and a new price/performance ratio feature will allow users to determine which processor offers the most bang for the buck. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on January 01, 2009

We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

Published on December 31, 2008

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » Hard Disks » The new and improved HDD Charts
 

The new and improved HDD Charts




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : The new and improved HDD Charts
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Does anyone like the new hdd chart format/technology?
How is it better?
How is it worse?

I'm just curious if I'm the only one that really doesn't like new format. It's all neat dragging and dropping but aside from that I really don't get any more from it. In fact, it seems to take longer to load and use.

Any thoughts anyone?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I don't care, when I need a HD I buy the largest HD with a 5 Year warranty that is Sata II with a 32MB cache and not an overpriced Raptor, that is available for sale under $200.

Profile: stranger
More Information

bobbknight wrote :

I don't care, when I need a HD I buy the largest HD with a 5 Year warranty that is Sata II with a 32MB cache and not an overpriced Raptor, that is available for sale under $200.



I can see the simplicity in your logic. You raise a good point...Are all sataII hdds created equal??

Stop playing with that you will go Blind!
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Most HDD are created equal. The Seagate Perpendicular Recording drives are fast. I have 3 320 Seagate 7200.10 drives in a RAID 0 and I love them. They are fast and I have not has one problem with the Seagates. My kids computer has 2 WD 250 in a RAID0 and Never a problem with them.

I had one DOA drive from Seagate when we ordered 250 40 Gig hard drives for work, not a bad ratio. I have never had a dead WD drive, but over the past 15 years I have only had 20 or so. Most drives will last along time as long as you dont drop them (only did that once) or move your desktop while its on.

The larger cache is better with some applications. Most 7200 harddrives will perform around the same level. The SATA controller also makes a difference.

If you look at the Seagate 7200.11 they have the highest average transfer rate and the lowest access time for the 7200 RPM drives. The only higher access times are the Raptors.

The best thing to do as BobbyKnight said was look for the 5 year warranty. Some HD companys are lowering to 2-3 years.

1Haplo

Profile: stranger
More Information

So are we agreeing that the "interactive" (not much roi there) hdd charts, that THG supplies, are a waste of a user's time?

Profile: stranger
More Information

I actually use the test results -- PCMark file transfer rates in particular -- in order to gauge whether some drives are going to waste less of my time when I do backups.

I'd like to see Tom's add a REAL FORMATTED CAPACITY figure next to the stated capacity. Samsung LIES about its mobile drive capacity. The 250GB 2.5" drive I just bought is only 160GB formatted. The new "half-terrabyte" 2.5" drive is only 334GB formatted!

Profile: addict
More Information

a_k_a wrote :

I actually use the test results -- PCMark file transfer rates in particular -- in order to gauge whether some drives are going to waste less of my time when I do backups.

 

I'd like to see Tom's add a REAL FORMATTED CAPACITY figure next to the stated capacity. Samsung LIES about its mobile drive capacity. The 250GB 2.5" drive I just bought is only 160GB formatted. The new "half-terrabyte" 2.5" drive is only 334GB formatted!

 

that is quite the jump in size differences after formatting...
are you sure your right clicked and pressed the format button right? :lol:


---------------
Invented a new file compression... remove all the '0'. They are nothing anyways...
Q6600 O/C to 3.6Ghz wc
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=229261

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » Hard Disks » The new and improved HDD Charts

Go to:
 

Google Ads