IMO crap review, the guys reading specs without knowing what they mean to anything.
"
It's a 256bit card , so the bandwidth on this thing is insane"
Jeez guess he never heard of 512bit, 386bit, 320bit cards with similar clocks.
'
when you turn the filters on it runs faster'
I've seen those benchies elsewhere (I remember the charts but not the sitename [but the results are similar to those of
Computerbase's 8X results) and really that's cherry picking. Running at 8X is very high and really only playable at 1280x1024, so it's not an option most people would use since they'd likely be running at higher res with lower AA if they're selecting a card like this. Also it depends on the game, look at the different benchies in the computerbase review and you see when the games are more texture bound or shader bound as well.
IMO this guy is reading some other (non-telegenic) guy's benchmarks and picking the things that will make the card look good and worth talking about so people will buy them. Being based on TigerDirect I'd say treat this guy like a car salesman, he's probably have told you how great the GeforceFX or XGI Volari V8 Duo was if he or his overlords thought it would sell more of them from their site.
edit: updtd computerbase link