I would say the 256Mb 8800GT, because it's just the better card. However, I just bought a 3850 for my dad's B-day because I didn't want to go over $200. If it was my comp, I would pay the extra change.
Message edited by clintox on 12-09-2007 at 03:26:02 AM
The 3850 is good if your on a budget as it can be had at $170. The 8800GT 256 is the better card, but also costs $40 more!
--------------- The Truth About GPU Power Consumption Home: E4600@3.6Ghz|AC7|P35|4GB|640GB|8800GT|Vista64|24" P-MVA
Work: Phenom9500@2.5Ghz|AC64|690G|3GB|500GB|8600GT|XP|2x22" TN
If going between those two 256MB cards, I'd take the $160 HD3850 from bestbuy. I don't like the way the 256MB GT gets destroyed by the 512MB version so far in what we have seen. I wouldn't spend over $200 on a 256MB card anymore.
everyone has problems w/all drivers. sometimes i have problems with nvidia's and sometimes with ccc. 8800gts in one system and 1900xt in the other. gts better in games / xt better watching movies. everyone has different experiences. everything has it's downside. i preffer ccc over forceware though.
Message edited by albundy2 on 12-09-2007 at 05:13:22 AM
And when is Tom going to put the 8800 gt 256 in their VGA charts?
the 8800 GT and 38x0 series are coming very soon!
As for driver problems, haven't seen anything of note in years except some vista stuff. Both Nvidia and Ati have their quirks but no show stoppers in XP.
As for which one I'd pick... if it was the same price, the 8800 GT of course. At the prices they are, either is fine...
I had the same decision and I chose the 3850. It seems to run all games well at high resolutions (1680 x 1050), plus I'm a casual gamer and don't want to have a super good graphic card, because I would feel more obligated to use it more ;P