Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

SLI 8800GT or SLI 8800GTS (G92)

Tags:
  • Graphics Cards
  • SLI
  • Windows Vista
  • Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
December 12, 2007 9:27:56 AM

Building a new system (by the end of the year, as a tax write-off), should I go with SLI 8800GT or SLI 8800GTS, and why? My new system will probably have the following specs (and any suggestions are appreciated here too) Q6600 w/ 4GB ram running on Windows Vista (32bit for now).

Also, are there any special requirements for the type of motherboards used other than must be 680i?


Thanks,
Hit

More about : sli 8800gt sli 8800gts g92

December 12, 2007 9:48:42 AM


should I go with SLI 8800GT or SLI 8800GTS
said:

should I go with SLI 8800GT or SLI 8800GTS
which one fits your budget ?


are there any special requirements for the type of motherboards used other than must be 680i?
said:

are there any special requirements for the type of motherboards used other than must be 680i?
since you want to use SLI, you need to look an Nvidia mainboard with 680i or 650i chipset.

December 12, 2007 9:55:50 AM

Quote:
which one fits your budget ?

Either. This system will be a tax write-off for this year, so price isn't too much of a concern. Was even thinking about SLI'd GTXs, but having a hard time convincing myself to spend that much for video cards.

One thing, I will probably be running at higher resolutions, with a 3 monitor setup.
Related resources
December 12, 2007 10:38:30 AM

Hitman34 said:
4GB ram running on Windows Vista (32bit for now).


You won't be able to use 4gb with a 32bit OS
December 12, 2007 11:36:34 AM

by the end of the year, the geforce 9 series will be making their way into the market
December 12, 2007 11:41:13 AM

razor512 said:
by the end of the year, the geforce 9 series will be making their way into the market


Keep in mind folks that this new GTS does not currently support DX10 version coming out soon. The 9 series will. Pretty much any Nvidia we buy atm is most likely going to have a year to a year and a half of life in it. I dont know any developers that are going to bother supporting the old DX10 inside of 2 years.
December 12, 2007 12:04:17 PM

This is a direct comparison, the G92 GTS is on average 10% faster than the GT for a 20% jump in price. To the budget conscious, this may not be worth it, but considering that 1) that 50 dollars spent anywhere else will not net that 10% gain, 2) money is not too big an issue for you being a tax write off, and 3) at your higher resolution gaming, that 10% may be important, I'd say the GTS is your card.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/12/12/geforce_8800_gts...

And the 9 Series isn't rumored to be released until February, not this year.
December 12, 2007 12:07:39 PM

If it's a tax write off, just go for GTXs. If you need to write the money off, then just take the plunge.

Otherwise, given your situation I'd go for GTS
December 12, 2007 12:34:16 PM

You can't go wrong with either card. If you're writing this off then why not go GTS. Faster, quieter, and cooler. It does draw more power, but nothing a Silencer 750 can't handle.

Why would you not chose Vista64 with 4GB of RAM? The nature of your post indicates to me that you are aware of the ~3.2GB limit of Vista32, so what is your reasoning here?
December 12, 2007 4:07:33 PM

2008 didn't even start yet and the geforce 8 series are already struggling with new games, why not wait for something better
December 12, 2007 4:32:41 PM

i grow weary of these posts from strangers. should i get (plug in latest and greatest component here) or (other l.a.g.c here)? you don't appear more '1337' because you can pretend to buy only the best, put your tiny epeen away.

here's an idea...DO YOUR OWN EFFING RESEARCH! there are an awful lot of reviews on an awful lot of sites that answer that question for you but i will answer it for you:

ONE COSTS MORE FOR A NEGLIABLE INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE. you figure it out, you seem like a mensa candidate anyway.
a c 169 U Graphics card
December 12, 2007 5:00:05 PM

razor512 said:
2008 didn't even start yet and the geforce 8 series are already struggling with new games, why not wait for something better


I have to disagree, there is no single game that i can max out with my rig
Crysis @ Very high (VISTA) and High(in XP) with 4xAA (resolution is 1680x1050)
Bioshock,COH,COD4,WORLD IN CONFLICT,HL2:EP2 and lots of other things, havent had any problem maxing out these games :bounce:  :D 
December 12, 2007 5:11:35 PM

sure you can max them out but are you getting the right framerates at maxed out settings in games like crysis? (such as 50-60FPS?)
a c 169 U Graphics card
December 12, 2007 5:57:01 PM

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/page-246214_15_120....

Yes, with everything @ high((in XP) and with 0xAA with 1680x1050, my Min FPS was 20 and the MAX FPS was 60

i played it with 4xAA too with no problems at all, but i dont remember the exact FPS, sorry i think it was 50-55 (Max FPS)
December 12, 2007 6:40:02 PM

Hitman34 said:
Building a new system (by the end of the year, as a tax write-off), should I go with SLI 8800GT or SLI 8800GTS, and why? My new system will probably have the following specs (and any suggestions are appreciated here too) Q6600 w/ 4GB ram running on Windows Vista (32bit for now).

Also, are there any special requirements for the type of motherboards used other than must be 680i?


Thanks,
Hit


I have an idea. Why don't you just read the article about the G92s you stupid fuk. We aren't you personal internet army. Go do your own goddamm research and keep your tard questions off these forums.
-cm
December 12, 2007 6:59:08 PM

Quote:
homerdog -
Why would you not chose Vista64 with 4GB of RAM? The nature of your post indicates to me that you are aware of the ~3.2GB limit of Vista32, so what is your reasoning here?


I actually would like to go to the 64bit version (mainly to up the ram to 8gb or more), but I'm concerned with possible compatibility issues with my different development environments (which is what this system will mainly be used for). I'm a software developer (independent consultant) and based on my clients needs, I am still having to use legacy development environments (VB6, Foxpro/Clipper, etc) for about 60 percent of my work. I'm just not sure what issues I might encounter.

Quote:
Maziar -
what resolution do u play @ ?


Atleast 1680 x 1050.


Sorry for the noob questions, I haven't been on the hardware side of things for a long time. I have actually not had a desktop pc for about 5 years. I have pretty much lived off a laptop, with most of my time on the road. At the time I built my last system, the RivaTNT was the new card on the block, so that should tell you how long I had it. Pretty much all my "gaming" has been done on the console.


A question about the 9 series, will they be able to run on a 680i mb?


I appreciate everyone's help, thanks!
a c 169 U Graphics card
December 13, 2007 8:04:04 AM

Yes they will be able to run on 680i chipset
December 13, 2007 4:52:31 PM

Hitman34 said:
I actually would like to go to the 64bit version (mainly to up the ram to 8gb or more), but I'm concerned with possible compatibility issues with my different development environments (which is what this system will mainly be used for). I'm a software developer (independent consultant) and based on my clients needs, I am still having to use legacy development environments (VB6, Foxpro/Clipper, etc) for about 60 percent of my work. I'm just not sure what issues I might encounter.

That makes sense.
December 15, 2007 8:02:08 AM

i would just get the gtx from evga.. and if the rumors are right about the 9 series coming out in feb then just do a step-up for that...
December 15, 2007 9:25:23 AM

flip_x said:
i would just get the gtx from evga.. and if the rumors are right about the 9 series coming out in feb then just do a step-up for that...


Word.
December 15, 2007 11:08:55 AM

jrnyfan said:
i grow weary of these posts from strangers. should i get (plug in latest and greatest component here) or (other l.a.g.c here)? you don't appear more '1337' because you can pretend to buy only the best, put your tiny epeen away.

here's an idea...DO YOUR OWN EFFING RESEARCH! there are an awful lot of reviews on an awful lot of sites that answer that question for you but i will answer it for you:

ONE COSTS MORE FOR A NEGLIABLE INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE. you figure it out, you seem like a mensa candidate anyway.


Oh dear, I think somebody has run out of pills.. (sigh)
Ryan Adds.
December 15, 2007 1:50:12 PM

SLI can only push one monitor at a time so you will not be able to use that for a 3 monitor set up. you can switch back and forth from sli to independent cards but you will need to reboot. i just would not expect to play crysis very well in high resolution even with two of those cards.
January 23, 2008 4:33:00 PM

celewign said:
I have an idea. Why don't you just read the article about the G92s you stupid fuk. We aren't you personal internet army. Go do your own goddamm research and keep your tard questions off these forums.
-cm



haha I just came across this thread and man could I use you for some psyc research I'm doing. I was wondering what kind of sexual experiences you have had, if any, and to what degree the lack of sex might be influencing your mood.

Also, what drives you to hang out in these forums, and why do you feel that you belong here at all?

January 23, 2008 4:35:46 PM

jrnyfan said:
i grow weary of these posts from strangers. should i get (plug in latest and greatest component here) or (other l.a.g.c here)? you don't appear more '1337' because you can pretend to buy only the best, put your tiny epeen away.

here's an idea...DO YOUR OWN EFFING RESEARCH! there are an awful lot of reviews on an awful lot of sites that answer that question for you but i will answer it for you:

ONE COSTS MORE FOR A NEGLIABLE INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE. you figure it out, you seem like a mensa candidate anyway.


I thought this forum had more respectability than that of a 13 year old 'leet' pirate. But given how little you know about the hardware you are flaming people over, I'd say trying to inform you would be totally useless.

Instead, I invite you to my psyc survey:

Do you need to get laid?

If you answered, yes, then at least you've made the first step to growing the !@#! up!
!