computers

whats better 2.0 or 3.0 ghz?

lol

im not to well wiht computers but i heard to stay away from 3.0 ghz processor is this true?

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applica [...] CatId=2632 so thius would be an average gaming computer here?

if i add a new garphics card?

That would be considered a rip off IMHO. This is better. And better priced...

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applica [...] CatId=2663

Then find yourself a graphics card, an 8600gt from newegg.com for around 100 bucks might be a good fit, then a monitor and I think you'd do allright.

i thought emachines were bad choices. so your telling me this pc is better then the one i posted?

from tiger or newegg

dollars what are you talking about?

Damn sub are you retarded? This is your third thread, same topic except now you say its for your friend.

The Pc you posted here is a piece of crap. It is a 3.0 SINGLE CORE.
The Gateway in the other post is a 2.0 DUAL core. So it is basically a 4.0 to put it to terms you can understand. The emachines would cost the same or more as the Gateway after you upgrade. Vista with 1g or ram runs like S H I T.


Problem is you want a gaming computer in a budget that is impossible by todays gaming standard. I've read all of your threads and know what you want more then anyone here probably, I researched for an hour and the Gateway from before is your ticket. Only future upgrade it would need is a video card, which is good because you would probably have a hard time upgrading those other ones as much as they need.

The Emachines here has a decent processor but needs more ram and it doesnt have the tv funtionability.