I don't fully understand how Ram stock frequencies work into overclocking.
Is it much better to run linked/synced?
If you were wanting to push FSB over 450, would there be significant performance change between running ddr2 6400 unlinked at a stable frequency, and having higher frequency ram that's linked, underclocked, with decreased letencies?
Should high quality ddr2 6400 be able to go beyond 450? If so would that require increased voltage?
depends on your ram. I have had Patriot and Crucial RAM that would. For the voltage, at those speeds, probably 2.2. If all you have are options like +.1, you'd probably have to do +.4, assuming the stock is 1.8.
------------------------------They call me crazy for yelling, alone in my room, at the computer screen. They just don\\\\\\\'t understand the game.
Reply to jeremyrailton
Bios wants to put it at 1.8, but spec sheet says 1.9. I've got it manually set at the corsair specs, running at 425MHz FSB. I'd guess corsair would be correct over EVGA/Nvidia
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.