Core 2 Duo Quad Q6600 regular vs. SLACR version

Angrykirill

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
47
0
18,530
What's the difference and will there be one for a gamer? The price difference is really small so it wouldn't mean much (to me at least) - but is there a reason to go for the more expensive SLACR?

Regards
-Kirill
 

spuddyt

Distinguished
Jul 21, 2007
2,114
0
19,780
basically depends if you are going to OC, if I were you, I would try and get the SLACR since the G0 stepping is apparently worth it for the very small difference in price since it lets u OC quite a lot more (although either one with an aftermarket cooler can get frankly stupid amounts higher)
 

exit2dos

Distinguished
Jul 16, 2006
2,646
0
20,810
SLACR is Intel's Specification Number for the G0 stepping. The previous stepping was "SL9UM". This number is on the chip, and will let you know what stepping version it is without having to install it and run CPU-Z first.
 

DrMaV

Distinguished
Aug 16, 2006
179
0
18,680
If you're not overclocking, there is no difference between the B3 revision "SL9UM" and the G0 revision "SLACR" for a gamer.

Even if you wanted to overclock, both can get to 3.0 GHz.

My B3 revision gets to 3.3 on intel heatsink, prime stable, and booted into windows at 3.7.

I would recommend, that if you're not going to overclock, then you try and buy something with a higher clock speed, such as the E6850 at 3.0 stock.

Games do not take much advantage of the 4 cores yet, and so, the dual core E6850 at 3.0 stock would be a better option.

 

Angrykirill

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
47
0
18,530


Thanks, will look into it - a very good point indeed.

 

Angrykirill

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
47
0
18,530
Does the Core 2 Duo E6850 require extra cooling? (Thermal paste maybe?) I'm not planning on OCing the box and couldnt find anything about it in any review