Phenom 9900 review

doghills

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2007
69
0
18,630
Here's the link.
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/phenom_9900/

My only complaint is they didn't compare it to the Q6600.
 

cnumartyr

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2007
2,287
0
19,780
Yea.. but they did compare it to a QX6700..

Anyways.. this is really good. If AMD brings it's Quad FX program back I'd consider one...

Also when BE 9900s come out I'll look into one.

Nice job AMD.
 

someguy7

Distinguished
Dec 12, 2007
1,186
0
19,310
That has to be the worse review article i have ever seen.

The Core 2 Quad QX6700 runs at 2.66GHz at stock speed, and I suspect that AMD will price the Phenom 9900 below the QX6700's current $949 price tag.

update: A reader pointed out that the Core 2 Quad E6700 running at 2.66GHz is available for $560

Fortunately it looks like the Phenom 9900 AMD sent us is a newer stepping - B2 to be precise - and even though it is not the fabled B3 stepping that will fix TLB erratum, it does seem to have opened up some extra "elbow" room.

Taking from the 1st and last page of that article
 

gpippas

Distinguished
May 11, 2007
463
0
18,790


Having read that I'm not even going to bother reading the article. How can you get so much wrong in 1 page.
 

d4NjvRzf

Distinguished
Sep 9, 2007
22
0
18,510
And still, AMD wins on the memory benchmarks while Intel outperforms on the real stuff (like games and 3-d rendering).