Beitzel15

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2008
544
1
18,995
Ok guys, Im building a comp and I cant decide if I shld get 2 hard drives that are 7200rpm or get 1: 150gig hard drive @ 10,000rpm just to put my games on and then a small 250gig @ 7200rpm for everything else...

The downside, the 150gig is $180!! Is it that much faster as to where it'd be worth the extra money or should I stick to 7200rpm hard drives?

thanks
 

Zorg

Splendid
May 31, 2004
6,732
0
25,790
I'm assuming you are talking about the Raptor 150. It is a little long in the tooth. If you really want to see a difference you will have to get the Velociraptor.

I recommend the WD 6400AAKS. It's fast and cheap. The random access times don't match the Raptor, but the differences aren't enough in my opinion.
 

4745454b

Titan
Moderator
What would the rest of the setup look like? Fast harddrives decrease load times, thats it. If you have to drop the CPU or GPU, get the slower drives. You might take a couple extra seconds to load a level, but once your there you'll have a much better gaming experience.
 

Beitzel15

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2008
544
1
18,995
If the difference between the 10,000rpm and the 7200rpm is only going to be around 10 seconds faster I wont get it but if we are talking 30-60+ seconds faster.. well thats a different story.
 

Zorg

Splendid
May 31, 2004
6,732
0
25,790
You will see a difference with the Velociraptor, but it's not going to be 30 - 60sec. Compare the categories yourself.

Benchmarks 3.5" Hard Drive Charts

I don't think the 6400AAKS is in there but it is a tad slower than the 7500AAKS. I wouldn't get the 7200.11, because it appears they have a lot of failures. the 7200.11s are fast but I think they are stretched banjo tight.
 

khelben1979

Distinguished
Apr 22, 2008
177
0
18,710
I definitely also believe that Western Digital is a better choice then going for that Seagate disk.

Just don't forget to add some cooling to the harddrive for a longer life span.