reading the reviews, it seems that the new g92 gts is about 10% faster than the gt.
i am wondering, if i am going to be buying a card in the near future, should i choose the GT or the GTS?
looking around some local shops i've found an OC GT for about $290, and then a GTS for about $360.
the price is higher, sure, but the card is faster and so i can't decide.
should i just grab the GT now while its available before it disappears from stocks again like after it's release? i mean this one i'm looking at is OC too, so the performance gap will be less than 10%.
thing is with the gt's overheating problems even with the bigger fan your overclocking range will be rarther limited. my gts runs at 53 degrees idle full load even when fully overclocked max is 65 degrees i would highly recomend the gts oh and at 65 degrees the fan is still quiet
700MHz is a pretty good factory OC. I say go for the 8800GT, the new 8800GTS is priced just a little too high, and not fast enough, to be chosen over an 8800GT right now (especially an OC version like yours).
i have a concern though. if the default is 400, then an OC to 700 is insane. even though its factory. seems a bit too high for me.
is this possible or is this some kind of trick and i'll be getting ripped off on something?
im pretty sure the referance core speed for the 8800 gt is 600 not 400 a 75% oc on a graphics card is insane. 100 mhz from the factory is usual but i would pay less for the close to stock version then oc it myself if you were going to get the gt but i will highly recommend the gts