Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Gigabyte 8800GT + ACCELERO S1 OC
 

Gigabyte 8800GT + ACCELERO S1 OC




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Gigabyte 8800GT + ACCELERO S1 OC
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I've OC my Gigabyte 880gt to:

GPU CLOCK: 685MHZ
I was suggested to set it to 700MHZ however any Hertz above 685 made 3DMARK06 to crash.
Memory: 1035MHZ
Shader: 1755MHZ

Score on 3DMARK06 - 14008

How is the score? good enough? any suggestion wether to approve or to lower the OC in order to gain card lifetime.

Would like to hear all the pros and cons on this one.

Thanks a lot.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

anyone?

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

14k is pretty good for most people, listing your other specs would probably net you a larger response though. :p (Like CPU & respective clock speed, Motherboard, etc) Also, there might be a thread for this somewhere.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Q6600 OC to 3.4GHZ
Crosair 800MHZ 1GB X 200 Small underclock stands at about ~770mhz
P5K-E WIFI-AP
ENERMAX 500W LIBERTY
AURORA 570
WD250GB YS X2 - RAID 0

14k is good enough? or should I try to increase more?

btw what did I hear its not suggested to increase memory about 1000mhz in the long term? is it right?

><))))º>
Profile: addict
More Information

Your 3DMark score is more dependent on your CPU than O/Cing your video card.


---------------
>< ))))º> >< ))))º> >< ))))º> >< ))))º> >< ))))º>
Profile: addict
More Information

I have the same graphics setup except with a BFG card. I got a higher overclock on the core and have not finished overclocking the memory, but my latest score with the hardware in my sig is 13,415. Few people with single cards have a score in the 14,000s. I would be pleased, as no two graphics cards OC the same.


---------------
Q6600 @ 3.2ghz w/ Tuniq Tower 120 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L |
2gb Super Talent PC6400 | BFG 8800GT OC 512mb (740/1854/1980) w/ Accelero S1 Turbo |
Corsair 450VX PSU | Cooler Master Elite 330 Case | Windows XP Pro | 3dMark06 14,716
Giggedy Giggedy Goo!
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I was getting around 13.5k in 3dmark06 with my rig (see sig)... Some people get higher, some get lower, but most of the mid-high range computers now are 12k-15k in 3dmark06, really.... anywhere in that range or above is good enough to play pretty much anything out now... with a few exceptions.


---------------
C2D e6850 @3.3ghz | 2x eVGA 8800GT (v2) 512mb @650/1625/1800 | 2gig Corsair XMS PC6400 @5-5-5-15
Asus P5N32-E SLI Mobo | 320gig HDD | Cosmos 1000 | 22" LG 2ms Widescreen | 3DMark06 = 14,626
Profile: addict
More Information

folius wrote :

I was getting around 13.5k in 3dmark06 with my rig (see sig)... Some people get higher, some get lower, but most of the mid-high range computers now are 12k-15k in 3dmark06, really.... anywhere in that range or above is good enough to play pretty much anything out now... with a few exceptions.




I would wager that you are not getting 13,500 with the rig in your sig right now... but you are right, if you are >12k, you can play just about anything right now.


---------------
Q6600 @ 3.2ghz w/ Tuniq Tower 120 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L |
2gb Super Talent PC6400 | BFG 8800GT OC 512mb (740/1854/1980) w/ Accelero S1 Turbo |
Corsair 450VX PSU | Cooler Master Elite 330 Case | Windows XP Pro | 3dMark06 14,716
Just call me Bill.
Profile: old hand
More Information

What should be manditory though if posting a 3dmark06 score is the SM2/3/CPU breakdown. My 8800GT is at 700/1000 BFG (and yes I did hear a rumor that long term over 1Ghz @ memory will 'fry' it, not sure how true it is) I forget my SM2/3 scores but my CPU is about 2500. It's a $90 E2180 OC to 3Ghz. Not to shabby. I'll go grab the Q6600 when it's cheap enough for that half-way upgrade, the 88GT is gonna be nestled in my case for at least another 3 years or so. I'll update my SM scores when I get a chance. LoL Just noticed my detailed 06 scores are in my info, forgot about that, here it is.

3DMark Score 11283 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score 5045 Marks

SM 3.0 Score 5408 Marks

CPU Score 2545 Marks

Thats with memory at 1950, I'll check my records for my cpu 3Ghz and GPU 700/1000 (I thinks its only 100-200 points higher with 1Ghz mem)


Message edited by bildo123 on 01-02-2008 at 07:05:59 PM

---------------
The computer allows you to make mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila- Mitch Ratcliffe
Giggedy Giggedy Goo!
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Turdburglar wrote :

I would wager that you are not getting 13,500 with the rig in your sig right now... but you are right, if you are >12k, you can play just about anything right now.



You can wager... i dont care. I said around that score... somtimes lower but thats AROUND my best one. I dont post exact numbers because who cares if you have 12,789 3dmark.. just say 12,800.

Profile: addict
More Information

folius wrote :

You can wager... i dont care. I said around that score... somtimes lower but thats AROUND my best one. I dont post exact numbers because who cares if you have 12,789 3dmark.. just say 12,800.




I'm not trying to be rude, but you aren't within a few points of 13,500 either... 12,800 is much more likely. The score itself doesn't matter. The misinformation you are spreading does.


---------------
Q6600 @ 3.2ghz w/ Tuniq Tower 120 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L |
2gb Super Talent PC6400 | BFG 8800GT OC 512mb (740/1854/1980) w/ Accelero S1 Turbo |
Corsair 450VX PSU | Cooler Master Elite 330 Case | Windows XP Pro | 3dMark06 14,716

Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Gigabyte 8800GT + ACCELERO S1 OC

Google Ads
Ad
News

Graphics: $100 GeForce 9600GSO by Forsa, Passively Cooled 8800GT by ECS

Published on June 04, 2008

There isn’t much news on the graphics side at the Computex showfloors, as both AMD and Nvidia are not yet ready with their next generation products. Yet we found two interesting products. Read more

MSI and Gigabyte dismiss merger rumors

Published on March 29, 2006

From DigiTimes Read more

Gigabyte introduces Nvidia nForce Professional RoHS-compliant motherboard

Published on September 06, 2005

Gigabyte Technology recently introduced an AMD Opteron-based GA-2CEWH motherboard, its first product that follows the EU's Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) legislation. Read more

Gigabyte launches quad SLI-ready gaming platform

Published on January 16, 2007

Gigabyte United, a joint-venture of Gigabyte Technology and Asustek Computer, has launched its GA-N680SLI-DQ6 high-end gaming platform, featuring the Nvidia nForce 680i SLI MCP chipset, supporting Intel Core 2 Extreme Quad-Core processors, and delivering what the company calls Gigabyte 6-Quad technologies. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more

Stalker: Clear Sky - Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more