Wolfdale E8200, E8400, and E8500 Review

zenmaster

Splendid
Feb 21, 2006
3,867
0
22,790
The e8400 is likely the sweet spot.

Only $20 more than the E8200 and $80 Less than the E8500 but clocked only 0.16Ghz less.

I wish they had OC'd that one as well.
However, there may be wide variation in the OC speed of these chips.
I was surprised that the two chips hit such different levels despite being identical chips on identical steppings with only default speeds different.

Binning may play some role. The E8200 only hit about 3.3Ghz on stock voltage which is not much over the 3.16Ghz of the E8500. I suspect Intel likely tests with a mild OC so this one got bumped down the lower bin.

My next CPU will likely be the E8400, but we will see.
 

OlSkoolChopper

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
564
0
18,980


If there are no new Yorkies in 2 wks, I'll be rite behind you, and I mean that in the most respectful, hetrosexual way posible! :bounce:
 

gamebro

Distinguished
Mar 10, 2007
239
0
18,680
Yes I too really enjoyed that article! Xbit labs has been late on many things lately, but every now and then they get to be the heroes =)

I also pointed out there, the lack of E8400 OC results, but no doubt it will be very close to the E8500, since the only difference is the 9 to 9.5 multi. It is definitely the sweet spot in pricing. Pretty cool how they easily got to a 4.3ghz OC lol.
All in all, what an excellent product. Definitely lived up to the expectations.

In the article they mention these chips will be for sale in just a few days? I hope that is true, I got my $ ready!
 

OlSkoolChopper

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
564
0
18,980
71g73nb.jpg
 

OlSkoolChopper

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
564
0
18,980


I figure its gona be pretty close to the E85's OC figures, maybe 100-200MHz below, seting per setting.
 

metrazol

Distinguished
Apr 16, 2007
94
0
18,630
That's amazing. 10-15% performance improvement, lower heat, lower power consumption, and all at no extra expense compared to their 65nm counterparts. :bounce:
 

OlSkoolChopper

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
564
0
18,980


That's the best advice if you can wait. I've got a Pentium D on its last legs that is just hankerin for the trash heap. I'll go 45nm now and 32nm when it comes out.
 

OlSkoolChopper

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
564
0
18,980


fortunately my P-D is not crashing (fingers crosed) but it's kinda like trying to keep up with Valentino Rossi when your on a chinese pocketbike. I need lots more scroti. :lol:
 

quantumsheep

Distinguished
Dec 10, 2005
2,341
0
19,790


Pentium D's are still way more than powerful enough for most applications if they're overclocked. I have my D920 running at 4.3ghz (and has been for way over a year) and it's still a stonkingly good system. Show that to anyone 5 years ago and they'd burn you at the stake for witchcraft!
 

OlSkoolChopper

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2007
564
0
18,980
I vote for Wolfie for President.

Quantumsheep, you're absolutely right, but I have 1GB RAM, running Vista Biz, usually have three or four apps runing includng Photoshop, it's not worth upgrading my memory, the mobo is a Lenovo so I'm not even sure if it will OC at all, so it's best to just retire it...
 

hypermagic

Distinguished
Dec 27, 2007
32
0
18,530
Even if the 8200 only goes to 3.2 on stock volts, that should be mind-numbingly fast enough for me, coming from a Northwood P4.

I'm scrapping the P35 and E2160 and getting a X38 and E8200.