Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Radeon HD3850 vs. HD2900PRO

Radeon HD3850 vs. HD2900PRO

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Radeon HD3850 vs. HD2900PRO

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Ok...both of these I'm lookin at have 512 MB, 256-bit processing (actually there's a 512, 512 2900PRO)

Wouldn't they have the same performance...they're both GDDR3 too?

Confused

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

sorry just saw someone posted the same topic

Reply to clayforhim648

3870 is better check legit review

Reply to dragonsprayer

It should be about same performance except that 3850 would be whole lot better in power consumption, has dx10.1, and possibly better AA performance.

------------------------------ Asus P5B vanilla with E6300 B2 stepping @ 3.5
4 gigs Gskill
8800GTS 756/1836/1037
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ew-benches
Reply to marvelous211

The HD2900PRO 256bit only has a single 8pin power connector not two like the 512bit, do you think it's still power hungry over the HD3850? I guess it only has a 6pin connnector and a heatsink only model so It's a better bet if you don't have a problem with PCI-E 2.0.

Reply to low351

low351 wrote :

The HD2900PRO 256bit only has a single 8pin power connector not two like the 512bit, do you think it's still power hungry over the HD3850? I guess it only has a 6pin connnector and a heatsink only model so It's a better bet if you don't have a problem with PCI-E 2.0.



yes power hungry

------------------------------ Asus P5B vanilla with E6300 B2 stepping @ 3.5
4 gigs Gskill
8800GTS 756/1836/1037
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ew-benches
Reply to marvelous211

yeah, it will draw a lot more power than the 3850. The 3850 is based on a 55nm process.

Go for the 512 3850.

Or a 512-bit 2900 PRO if you can find one (and if you don't mind the power consumption).

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.06 GHz/1.275v - Zalman CNPS8700LED - Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L - 4 GB A-Data DDR2 800 @ 850 MHz/5-5-5-15 - XFX Core Edition GTS 250 1GB @ 738/1836/1100 - Seagate 250 GB 7200.10 hdd - Silverstone ST400 - Vista Ult. x64
Reply to Cpt Deadboots

yeah, it will draw a lot more power than the 3850. The 3850 is based on a 55nm process.

Go for the 512 3850.

Or a 512-bit 2900 PRO if you can find one (and if you don't mind the power consumption).

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.06 GHz/1.275v - Zalman CNPS8700LED - Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L - 4 GB A-Data DDR2 800 @ 850 MHz/5-5-5-15 - XFX Core Edition GTS 250 1GB @ 738/1836/1100 - Seagate 250 GB 7200.10 hdd - Silverstone ST400 - Vista Ult. x64
Reply to Cpt Deadboots

Well I actually have the 2900 Pro 256-bit and I'm able to hi 11k in 3dmark06 with my OC using only a 6-pin adapter. I just ordered a 3850 512mb card, and it should be here by Monday. I'm going to do a full comparison of both cards. as soon as it comes in. I'm hoping that I can achieve better performance with the 3850 512Mb when OC'd versus the 2900 Pro OC'd.

If you want to wait, I'll post my results, that way you can know which one for sure is better.

Reply to IndigoMoss

Im interested in your results soo please post them. I got a 2900pro with the full 512bit bus. Not tried oc'ing yet.

Reply to spoonboy

What kind of specs are you running and what's your 3Dmark06? at 850/2000 I'm able to pull 11,003 3dMarks. At stock it's at 9,000 3Dmarks.

My Specs:
Intel Core 2 Duo e6300 @3.2Ghz

2GB of DDR2-800

ATI 2900Pro @ 850/1000 benchmarks @800/1000 normal

3x500GB Seagate Barracuda .10 Sata, 1 WD 320GB Sata, 1 250GB Seagate Barracuda .10 IDE

Evga 680i SLI A1

Thermaltake T2 430w

Reply to IndigoMoss

1000 is a pretty big o/c on the memory though.

what are your temps?

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.06 GHz/1.275v - Zalman CNPS8700LED - Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L - 4 GB A-Data DDR2 800 @ 850 MHz/5-5-5-15 - XFX Core Edition GTS 250 1GB @ 738/1836/1100 - Seagate 250 GB 7200.10 hdd - Silverstone ST400 - Vista Ult. x64
Reply to Cpt Deadboots

43c, fan at 39%, which is still inaudiable for me. Tomorrow I'll have the 3850 512mb, so I'll be able to show you guys which one is better, I'm hoping on the 3850 512mb, because it cost me more money.

Reply to IndigoMoss

Have you benchmarked it yet??

curious thats all

Reply to spoonboy

EAH3850/G/HTDI/512M

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx? [...] 2=8&l3=602

Low noise and low power consumption....

Reply to JPain

Indigomoss: So did you get a comparison done? I'm surprise your HD2900 is around 43C mine idles at 47C and hits up around 60C on load. What are you using to overclock, riva or Atitool? And did you replace the bios with a german hack?

EDIT: alright I found out where you posted them. Thanks.

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ro-results


Message edited by low351 on 02-22-2008 at 09:01:11 PM
Reply to low351

Yup no problem man. BTW I've been using ATItool for the 3850 as opposed to Rivatuner for the 2900Pro.

Reply to IndigoMoss
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Radeon HD3850 vs. HD2900PRO
Go to:

There are 1198 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them