Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Kentsfield quad-core processors to sell for less than $1200

Published on November 10, 2006

While Intel reportedly is gearing for a launch of its quad-core processors on Monday next week, a wide range of etailers has begun pre-selling or even selling the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 processor. Read more

Intel Adds 3 New Value CPUs

Published on September 02, 2008

Intel has updated its pricing sheet for processors Monday and although prices have not changed, three new value processors have been added Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in a show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

For the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Homebuilt Systems » New System Build » q6600 core speed question
 

q6600 core speed question




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : q6600 core speed question
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi Everyone,
I got all the parts for my computer yesterday and got it up and running at 1 AM last night - it appears to be in decent shape. it's the quitest computer I've ever been around.

I'm debating OC'ing my PC and saw something unusual when looking at CPU-Z. It reports that my core speed is 1600 MHz instead of 2400. I figured this was something I didn't understand, and went looking on line for other snapshots with a Q6600 G0 stepping. What's strange is that mine says the multiplier is x 6.0 instead of 9.0, which is the value I see here:
http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/2527/cpuzhz0.png

The way I figure it is 266 * 9 = 2.4 Ghz, where my computer is 266 * 6 = 1.6 GHz.
The specs for the PC are,
Antec p180
q6600
stock intel fan
gigabyte X38-DQ6
Corsair 2GB PC8500 1066Mhz 240-Pin DDR2 RAM
gForce 8800GTS
Corsair HX620W ps
WD 150Gb raptor

Three fans are running and the temp is never above 42 celc.


I'm also looking at CPU-Z's memory tab and it's saying that the memory's max bandwidth is 400MHz, which seems low. Shoud the memory be this low?

Forgive the newbie questions, but I'm not sure how much I want to go into OC'ing this system it but if there's something wrong then it's important to know it. Thanks for any help ..
David




Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: old hand
More Information

Its speed stepping, it'll jump to 2.4Ghz (9 multi) when you need more power. There is a sticky answering this question, as this question is being asked very regularly.

You'll probably be able to adjust your memory settings in Bios.

If you cannot figure out how to adjust this yourself, perhaps you should not be overclocking, learn the basics first and then start to overclock, true the C2D's and C2Q's are easy to overclock, but if you understand more about your settings first you are more likely to get a stable OC and less likely to break something.

How are you measuring temps, read some of the stickies, your temps may be good or bad depending on precisely what you are measuring and how, 42 idle for core temp is hot in a P180, 42 load for core temp is cold (and probably means it is not being read right)...

I'm not trying to be harsh, but most of the answers are out there, reading them will help you to understand more, and will help you to fix things when it goes wrong and you can't get on the forum to ask questions.

BAM!
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

---------------
"This thread made me strap on my lolerskates and head for my roflcopter."
Profile: stranger
More Information

Very Sorry ...
To bother you guys, I guess if I had thought to look in the 'CPU' forum for my 'CPU' problem, and not the new builds forum, I wouldn't have to ask the question. Much thanks for the advice, regardless. Believe it or not both answers led me down avenues to explore, so I'm going to let it go until I'm better versed. This things wicked fast as it is ...

Profile: old hand
More Information

Glad we are able to help.

If you hang around here for a while you'll start to see exactly the same question being asked at least once per week. Sometimes the people are upset with intel that their machine isn't as 'fast' as it should be and think they are being ripped off. Sometimes, they won't listen to the answers (in that respect you have been a model questioner). If you stay here even longer you will also get fed up of answering the same question over and over again, when 15s of searching would give the newb an answer (OK maybe 30s the THG search system isn't the best).

People really really don't mind answering questions, and helping to solve problems. Unfortunately overclocking used to be difficult, now it is a lot easier to get a great result, but the fundementals need to be there so that you know you are not pushing the evenlope to far, and so that you now that not all CPUs are created equal with respect to overclocking.

jsc
Profile: old hand
More Information

I do not recommend going above 3.0 GHz with a stock Intel HSF.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Homebuilt Systems » New System Build » q6600 core speed question

Go to:
 

Google Ads