Try to find the agp version of the 2600XT, it's better than everything you've suggested. Right now newegg doesn't have the 256 MB version it but keep a lookout.
Message edited by nightscope on 01-06-2008 at 08:09:06 PM
Well judging from the price I would definitely go with the 2600 XT, try to find the 256 MB version though unless you're planning to game above 1600X1200 resolution.
Well judging from the price I would definitely go with the 2600 XT, try to find the 256 MB version though unless you're planning to game above 1600X1200 resolution.
If you can wait and save up some money, Sapphire is releasing an HD3850 for the AGP bus. It will be the best card for AGP and will allow you to avoid having to upgrade your whole system for awhile longer.
http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?48796
No mention of price, but it should fall around the $200 mark.
------------------------------3 more years to get my BSEE @ UNH Intel E2200 @ 2.90Ghz (264x11) | 3GB DDR2 800 G.Skill (2x1GB, 2x512MB) | Gigabyte DS3L | Gigabyte 8800GT 512 @ 675/1566/900 | 160GB Seagate 7200rpm SATAII | Seasonic 500Watt SS-500ES | XP Pro
Reply to soloman02
Less memory isn't better if it is clocked the same. BUT, it is very often cheaper. And 512MB is typically going to help most at higher resolution and/or with FSAA or with massive textures (says Oblivion texture mod). And even the 2600XT isn't going to do very well in those cases. That is why he would recommend the 256MB card....save you money. If priced the same and clocked the same by all means go with the 512MB card. But if the 256MB is a fair amount cheaper or it is clocked higher( say GDDR3 in the X1650,s or 2600 pro), then grab the 256MB card.
More of a phaseout I would say. Newegg would rather devote shelf space to faster moving products. I am sure they will still carry a few AGP cards though.
------------------------------I know what I know, and I don't know what I don't know.
Reply to tlmck
I can vouche for the 7600gt. I have been using it close to a year now and the card puts up well with BF2142 at 1400x900 and CoD4 at 1280x1024 running mostly at high settings.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.