As those of you who live on the forums probably know, I'm currently overclocking a new computer (thanks for the help!).
I fixed the heating issue (got a new heatsink - Xigmatek pushpins just fail), and the OC issue (This Q6600 can barely do 3.5, and 3.6 is right out), and now have a memory question:
This probably gets asked often, with slightly different numbers, but here goes:
I have 2x2GB (4 GB total) PC 1066 G.Skill ram with 5-5-5-15 timings.
My processor's FSB is overclocked from 266x9 to 389x9 Is it better to have my ram as:
a) 1037 Mhz (Or somewhere around 1034-1037, I can't remember) with a 4:3 ratio and timings near 5-5-5-15 (before overclocking)
b) 778 Mhz with a 2:1 ratio and lower timings (presumably I can overclock timings more at a lower speed)
In other words, is the 1:1 'sweet spot' performance boost enough of a difference make taking a 260ish Mhz drop in RAM speed worth it? (even with the slightly better timings at a lower speed?) At what point would it stop being worth it?
Thanks!
Zithras
I fixed the heating issue (got a new heatsink - Xigmatek pushpins just fail), and the OC issue (This Q6600 can barely do 3.5, and 3.6 is right out), and now have a memory question:
This probably gets asked often, with slightly different numbers, but here goes:
I have 2x2GB (4 GB total) PC 1066 G.Skill ram with 5-5-5-15 timings.
My processor's FSB is overclocked from 266x9 to 389x9 Is it better to have my ram as:
a) 1037 Mhz (Or somewhere around 1034-1037, I can't remember) with a 4:3 ratio and timings near 5-5-5-15 (before overclocking)
b) 778 Mhz with a 2:1 ratio and lower timings (presumably I can overclock timings more at a lower speed)
In other words, is the 1:1 'sweet spot' performance boost enough of a difference make taking a 260ish Mhz drop in RAM speed worth it? (even with the slightly better timings at a lower speed?) At what point would it stop being worth it?
Thanks!
Zithras