Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » General Motherboard » Question on CPU, Memory, and FSB Speed
 

Question on CPU, Memory, and FSB Speed




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Question on CPU, Memory, and FSB Speed
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I just a quick question. When I put together my current PC, I made sure the the CPU, memory and FSB speeds matched up, because somewhere I read that this helped reach optimal perfomance. Does that still hold true with the current technology, or does it not matter anymore?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

bump

Profile: newbie
More Information

Sure, the components should match each other. It makes no sense to buy 800 MHz RAM with a quad-core CPU that supports 1333 MHz, and vice versa, as the whole system will run at the slower speed.

And the choice of your mainboard of course restricts you in which options will work at all.

Price is an issue as well. Unless you have a few millions to spare, and don't worry whether you spend €1000 or €4000, having the newest stuff means you're paying many times more than using yesterdays stuff (which will run current games just as fine). Compare €100 for a nice dual-core CPU with €1000 for the hottest quad-core CPU (the "quad" means squat with current games).

So, make sure the 3 parts you buy match together in the "price range" as well. I.e., running a €1000 quad-core CPU in a €59,- board sounds somewhat fishy, and running a €39,- Celeron in a €300 Asus Striker II Formula would be weird as well.

It's all a different story if you are upgrading; then it may make sense to upgrade single parts at a time, and have "incompatible" items for a while (until you upgrade the other stuff as well).

Profile: addict
More Information

You really didn't answer his question.


I have the Q6600 with a 1066 FSB. That being said I have my Q6600 overclocked to 3.2Ghz and I OC'd the FSB from 267 or 333 to 400. If your FSB is 400Mhz, then a 1:1 ratio would be obtained using DDR2 memory at 800Mhz.

If I were running my Q6600 at 333 (Not OC'd), then DDR2 667Mhz would be fine, anything faster would underclock itself.


To answer your question, it is still believed the 1:1 ratio you speak of is still believed to be the most optimal for the performance of your computer. Though benchmarks showing this are not readily available.


---------------
Antec Nine Hundred, Gigabyte P35-DS3R, Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme, eVGA 8800GT 512MB, G-Skill 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 4-4-4-10, Seasonic S12 ATX 650W, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA, Samsung 22" LCD, Windows XP Pro 64-bit
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

malachiv wrote :

I just a quick question. When I put together my current PC, I made sure the the CPU, memory and FSB speeds matched up, because somewhere I read that this helped reach optimal perfomance. Does that still hold true with the current technology, or does it not matter anymore?



It does not really matter.
Post a budget, an idea of what you want to do with your system and some folks will give you an idea of what to grab.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
Profile: member
More Information

+1 on deuce271

cjp3 wrote :

Sure, the components should match each other. It makes no sense to buy 800 MHz RAM with a quad-core CPU that supports 1333 MHz, and vice versa, as the whole system will run at the slower speed.



1333 is based off the 333 FSB with a multiplier. Memory will be 333 @ DDR = 667



Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » General Motherboard » Question on CPU, Memory, and FSB Speed

Google Ads
Ad
News

Intel, Micron Sample 200 MB/s Flash Memory

Published on February 01, 2008

Intel and Micron are first to announce NAND flash memory chips using the new high-speed interface specified by the Open NAND Flash Interface (ONFI) group: The new memory promises five times the read/write performance of flash memory devices available on the market today. Read more

Corsair releases FB DIMM 2 GB memory

Published on December 05, 2006

Corsair has just introduced the Fully Buffered DIMM (FB-DIMM) memory clocked at DDR2 667 MHz speed. Read more

DDR 2 800 MHz in shops by Christmas

Published on October 05, 2004

Just when DDR 667 is still a very rare memory bird, aggressive memory company OCZ is preparing a speed bump with DDR 2 800 memory. Read more

Philips develops non-volatile nano-electronic memory

Published on March 17, 2005

Scientists at Philips Research have developed a phase-change memory promising to match the speed, density, low-voltage and low-power consumption requirements of future deep sub-micron silicon chips. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

1,000 GB: Three Samsung TB Drives

Published on September 23, 2008

Storage vendors split the desktop hard drive market into performance, mainstream, and energy-efficient products. We looked at Samsung’s Spinpoint F, the RAID version and the EcoGreen F to discover how a 1,000 GB drive differs from another. Read more