alexmears1990 :
i run a overclocked 8600 gt.. it plays decently but im tired of overclocking the piss out of it to pull a few frames a second out of it.lol thatnks for the info. do u like yours?
Yeah seeing how an overclocked card performs is fun for a time but eventually the urge to upgrade gets you in the end. I love my 2900 pro from the 5 hours I got to test it out, then I had to leave my system for another two months (studying abroad). In all but one of my games its just another class, even with 100mhz less on the gpu than my 7900 was overclocked to, its something like 25-40% faster depending on the game being played (Im talking minimum not average frames here, averages is better than that i think). The only negative result was Colin McRae DiRT, actually lost something like 6fps in that one
Then again the installation might be buggered as my old profile wont load (yes I was connected to the internet at the time for those who've run into this problem before). But anyway if you can't come back to a game after 5 months or so not playing it without your saves having expired for some unknown reason, plus you can't save your progress anyway without being connected to the internet 'cos the game is soo chock-full of advertising and wants to send everything you do back to some codemasters server, .... well then f#ck it it's not worth playing. #End of rant#.
In short yes Im happy, I now know for myself how hot and power hungry the 2900 series is, and how loud the fan is over 33% load (33% load is good enough for 65 degrees celsius load temps by the way so dont worry about that), but this goes hand-in-hand with MUCH better performance than a 7900 gt at 700mhz so Im both shocked and impressed respectively.
Put it this way, the difference in crysis performance is just... wow ....just wow!
Please post how you get on, and if you feel the psu is right at the limit or not. Personally from my own short experience I would say that stock speeds should be safe and stable. Cheers.