and of course the Samsung 226BW, but that tacks on an extra $100 that I can't necesarily justify in my search for a new monitor.
The 2ms sounds nice and all, but it's quite insignificant in the grand scheme of things when you really compare 5ms to 2ms and how the human eye sees things. Just looking, you'd never be able to tell. Color clarity, etc?
I dunno, if you guys have any other thoughts/ideas let me know. the $100 price diff. is what's the killer for me here more than anything for monitors that would do the job quite well and not be so expensive.
------------------------------My Current System:
Asus P5N-E SLI 650i || Core 2 Duo E6400 || XFX OC Gefoce 7900GS
2gb OCZ Platinum R2 PC6400 || 250gb WD Caviar || 550w ePower X
in a Thermaltake Saprano!!
i had two of them acers before i got this dell, i really think you should go for it, it is cheap and effective, also, lcds are more like human eyes, they "blurr" frames together, instead of flahsing heaps of them really relly fast, so personally, anything faster then 5ms is overkill. only reasoni gotthe dell over the two of them is ebcause you can't use 2 monitors in 1 game in crossfire wiht the game spanned over the monitors
-------------------------------"From whence you came you shall remain, until you are complete again!"
Well the 2ms and 5 ms is just advertising, they can pretty much put in there what they want cause they aren't telling you what they are measuring that is 2 and 5 ms.
I'd save a few more bucks for a 1920 x 1200 monitor ....at least it's HD reday...well worth it in the long term methinks.
Well the 2ms and 5 ms is just advertising, they can pretty much put in there what they want cause they aren't telling you what they are measuring that is 2 and 5 ms.
I'd save a few more bucks for a 1920 x 1200 monitor ....at least it's HD reday...well worth it in the long term methinks.
Yes, thanks for recommending him a monitor that costs 180% of the one's he is looking at, and will require a better graphics card to be used at the same performance level.
Well the 2ms and 5 ms is just advertising, they can pretty much put in there what they want cause they aren't telling you what they are measuring that is 2 and 5 ms.
I'd save a few more bucks for a 1920 x 1200 monitor ....at least it's HD reday...well worth it in the long term methinks.
While it sounds nice, a 22" is about as large as I can go. My desk won't quite allow for a 24" because it has a bridge over the monitor. 24" are a little too tall. 22" just barely make their way in
While it sounds nice, a 22" is about as large as I can go. My desk won't quite allow for a 24" because it has a bridge over the monitor. 24" are a little too tall. 22" just barely make their way in
How big is your desk?
I have a corner desk with shelving on both sides.
I squeezed a Dell 24" into the space. It is tight but it worked.
IF there is a prayer of a 24" going into the space I sure would try to fit it in.
------------------------------I am old enough to be your grandfather.
It was born a Dell, it was made into a computer by StevieD
Reply to StevieD
LoL, montitor is a hard decision to make. At work, we have about 5 of the Acer monitor you are looking at, they are really solid. The only viewsonic we have is for our CFO (like this one: http://images.techtree.com/ttimage [...] 2_full.jpg) and I don't like it honestly. The picture on it is good, but the stand is kinda shabby. When put together, the screen sits crooked slightly in comparison to the stand. It isn't bad, it just bugs me. LoL... Don't know if that helps or not.
P.S.- I am sure both would be fine, so, based on that assumption, I would go Acer.
Message edited by TSIMonster on 01-03-2008 at 08:58:17 PM
I have this viewsonic. It works well for normal work and is decent for gaming. Have had zero issues with it to date. I did however switch to the HP 2207w for my newest build(under construction) Far superior IMO
After a ton of research on both monitors/reviews (omg my eyes are bleeding from reading about the same couple of monitors..) The Viewsonic seems like the best bet for me. I've used Viewsonic monitors in the past and trust them as a good brand for screens. The stats were a tad bit better than the Acer as well. I did hear about the cheap stand, but I actually might get an arm for it anyway, we shall see.
Thanks for the help, in the end I guess going with my gut was the best thing. Always seems to work out for me there
------------------------------My Current System:
Asus P5N-E SLI 650i || Core 2 Duo E6400 || XFX OC Gefoce 7900GS
2gb OCZ Platinum R2 PC6400 || 250gb WD Caviar || 550w ePower X
in a Thermaltake Saprano!!
Reply to Kyosuke
Well, I'm using it right now to type this message!
It's pretty amazing! Great quality and definately was well worth the investment thus far. No Dead Pixels either! Which is absolutely perfect!
The only lame thing was having to order the DVI cable seperately, but not really a big deal. It came a day later. The VGA had a little ghosting issues for gaming, but the DVI is just pure silk! Bright and Vibrant!
------------------------------My Current System:
Asus P5N-E SLI 650i || Core 2 Duo E6400 || XFX OC Gefoce 7900GS
2gb OCZ Platinum R2 PC6400 || 250gb WD Caviar || 550w ePower X
in a Thermaltake Saprano!!
Reply to Kyosuke
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.