Been suing a 24" Dell LCD at work, and now need to buy a monitor for home. So loking at 22-24. The size difference is not too much but there are other issues at work. The three biggest as I see them are pixel pitch, max resolution, and response times. What I don't know is how to compare these together.
For example a 24" has a max of 1920x1200 (which is the res I use at work) and 22" has a 1680x1050. So a little difference. But I have read that it really runs at this and just strectehs/compreses other resolutions I might use to fit. So in theory keeping the same aspect ratio would be imperitive to prevent major distortion. Problem is my rig is good but probably can't play games at the full resolution, so maybe the smaller native resolution would be good.
But how does pixel pitch and response times really affect use? I use mys system for desktop apps and games mostly. I guess at this point i an trying to figure out if the extra $ for a 24" is really worth it, other then the size part which is purely subjective. Any thoughts on the techncial aspects before I look into specific models?
For example a 24" has a max of 1920x1200 (which is the res I use at work) and 22" has a 1680x1050. So a little difference. But I have read that it really runs at this and just strectehs/compreses other resolutions I might use to fit. So in theory keeping the same aspect ratio would be imperitive to prevent major distortion. Problem is my rig is good but probably can't play games at the full resolution, so maybe the smaller native resolution would be good.
But how does pixel pitch and response times really affect use? I use mys system for desktop apps and games mostly. I guess at this point i an trying to figure out if the extra $ for a 24" is really worth it, other then the size part which is purely subjective. Any thoughts on the techncial aspects before I look into specific models?