Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » General Discussions » Ram OC 2.3V is Dangerous?
 

Ram OC 2.3V is Dangerous?

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Ram OC 2.3V is Dangerous?
 
Live or die, Make your choice
Profile: stranger
More Information

First of all my System.

Q6600
GA-EP35-DS3
Corsair 800Mhz XMS2 DHX PC2-6400 2GB Kit (4-4-4-12)
GeForce 6600 :(
TT TR RX 450W

Ok. my CPU runs now at 3Ghz 334x9 Without adding Voltage to the cpu 26% OC , and my ram At moment 835Mhz 5.8% OC 2.0V

Now Before that i tried somthing to take the RAM to 1066Mhz With 2.3V and It works, i did tests with prime95 orthos MemTest OCCT I passed all tests.
But again i read the is toooo much voltage , and i was afraid ill Ruin my Ram so i toke the voltage down.. But.

i saw an review on the ram i have and they OC with 2.3V.. So u think its Safe?

Heres what they do .

"With the timings loosened a little to 5-5-5-12 and the voltage kept at 2.3v, the XMS2 DHX managed an impressive overclock of 174 Mhz (DDR2 349), bringing the kit to a fantastic DDR2 speed of 1149. All the results taken were tested for absolute stability with OCCT stress testing."
FUll Review http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews [...] _4gb_kit/3
BTW , i didnt tray more then 1066Mhz for now.

So what u guys Think its safe or not?

http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/5131/pcsiganisy9.gif

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Sniper
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

No, the Corsair DHX should be fine. those RAM run at 2.1-2.2v on stock so +.1 shouldn't really hurt. I have run Crucial Ballastix up to 2.5v.


---------------
E2180 @3.2Ghz + P35DS3L +8400GS (700/475 OC)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/2588429538_b3c41b29c3.jpg
You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

i think the point is as long as its stable then its fine. then why dont you run prime bkebd test for 24 hours see if it fails or fry your chip?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

I don't think that you are going to see enough real world performance improvement to make it worth running 1066. It's harder on the MCH and RAM for very little gain. A lot of people are pushing 1:1 with tightened timings. Again I don't think you will find much difference, but the 1066 get's a little hot.

Memory bandwidth tests... any real differences (part 2) - ABXZone Computer Forums


Courtesy of Ryun from another thread.

ryun wrote :

To the OP Tom's actually did an article on RAM frequency and their benefits. Maybe it'll help you out: http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 807-8.html




Live or die, Make your choice
Profile: stranger
More Information

Shadow703793 wrote :

No, the Corsair DHX should be fine. those RAM run at 2.1-2.2v on stock so +.1 shouldn't really hurt. I have run Crucial Ballastix up to 2.5v.



Thank you (: now i feel much better (:

iluvgillgill wrote :

i think the point is as long as its stable then its fine. then why dont you run prime bkebd test for 24 hours see if it fails or fry your chip?



And i dont want to Fried :\


i was able to get
5-5-5-12 1113Mhz 2.2v

4-4-4-12 1002Mhz 2.3v <-- This was abit faster Make sense?

And BTW , i really feel the change? i know its there , but i can really feel performance improvement?

And thank you for your replies .

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

darq i think you should know the fact that running the ram at faster speed thent he FSB will get you virtual no gain at all. apart from maybe few ns reduction thats all. run the ram at 1:1 to fsb will be best.

Live or die, Make your choice
Profile: stranger
More Information

iluvgillgill wrote :

darq i think you should know the fact that running the ram at faster speed thent he FSB will get you virtual no gain at all. apart from maybe few ns reduction thats all. run the ram at 1:1 to fsb will be best.



i got reduction of about 17 ns

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

ok if you feel you going to get extra fps in game or in benchmark feel free. we all here just give you suggestions.

Live or die, Make your choice
Profile: stranger
More Information

i wanted to say something else and Edit my post but i got some evil msg "You are not allowed to edit this message! "

anyway.

yes ill do 1:1 to the FSB.
and Thank you guys (:

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

you can edit by clicking on the quick edit buttom rather then the edit buttom. as you cant delete a thread either or change anything in the title.

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

the extra give you quicker response but dont get the speed increase if the FSB is increase at the same time. that amount of strain on the memory and MCH will shorten the life span of the component dramatically. but of course i have no prove for this as i havent fried a memory or mobo this way.

Live or die, Make your choice
Profile: stranger
More Information

yea i know , well i just wanted to test abit , and also this ram got better cooling.
if its ok to run this ram at 2.3V
and sometimes we OC for the fun of it , to see how far it can go :P

 

but after all i got back to my normal

 

4-4-4-12 835Mhz 2.0V
With nice "small" OC Q6600 2.4Ghz to 3Ghz 334x9

 

All works fine i dont really feel i need more then that
Photoshop and Dreamwever launches in like 2.5 Sec and Next week ill get my HD4870
so ill see improvement on games as well.

 

iluvgillgill , Thank you for your help (:

  

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by darq on 07-01-2008 at 04:15:34 AM
You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information



what does that mean??? :lol: :pt1cable: :lol: :pt1cable:

Live or die, Make your choice
Profile: stranger
More Information

its a backward smile (:

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

oic. sorry i live at the modern world now. i only can read from left to right:P

The Official Intel Deep Fryer.
Profile: old hand
More Information

lol.... well personally i believe any voltage increase on ANY hardware will decrease its lifespan (either small or large...), but it all depends on how logn you wanna keep your system. i doubt that a system with an extreme OC and voltage changes would last 5 years running 10 hours a day....but then who keeps a gaming comp for that long? all up to ya preferences...

BTW i may be (and probably am) wrong, cos iluv is way smarter than me at overclocking but thats just my opinion.


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » General Discussions » Ram OC 2.3V is Dangerous?
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

MS June update fixes dangerous Word flaw

Published on June 14, 2006

Microsoft has released a bumper batches of 12 security updates - eight of them critical - as part of its regular Patch Tuesday update cycle. Read more

The Bear robot to the rescue

Published on August 30, 2006

According to Associated Content, Vecna Robotics has built a prototype of the BEAR Robot for the U.S. Army. Read more

Security firm detects IM bot that chats with you

Published on December 07, 2005

A new form of malicious instant-message bot is on the loose that talks back to the user, possibly signifying a potentially dangerous trend, an instant messaging security firm said. Read more

Apple Patches Quicktime Flaw For Vista, Mac OS X

Published on February 07, 2008

Apple has released an update for Quicktime to fix a potentially dangerous flaw that affects most versions of Mac OS X and Windows Vista, as well as Windows XP Service Pack 2. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more