Hi guys,
I recently upgraded my E6750 (selling on ebay) to a Q6600 G0. Why? Well, the E6750 would always hit 100% load while gaming along with background programs and services. My frame rates were okay but I knew the E6750 hit its maximum performance even though I overclocked it to 3.4Ghz.
I chose the Q6600 G0 because of its overclocking potential and attractive price. Right now I'm running the Q6600 at 3.4GHz gaming a little better than before with the E6750. My CPU load never reaches 100%.
I don't know if I should have waited for the new 45nm quadcores or not. It was delayed and the price for the Q9450 is expected around $350. I got my Q6600 for $274 shipping on Amazon. Besides the power efficiency and lower temps of the Q9450 and 7% increase clock for clock, I don't know if if its worth it to spend $80 more.
What do you think?
I recently upgraded my E6750 (selling on ebay) to a Q6600 G0. Why? Well, the E6750 would always hit 100% load while gaming along with background programs and services. My frame rates were okay but I knew the E6750 hit its maximum performance even though I overclocked it to 3.4Ghz.
I chose the Q6600 G0 because of its overclocking potential and attractive price. Right now I'm running the Q6600 at 3.4GHz gaming a little better than before with the E6750. My CPU load never reaches 100%.
I don't know if I should have waited for the new 45nm quadcores or not. It was delayed and the price for the Q9450 is expected around $350. I got my Q6600 for $274 shipping on Amazon. Besides the power efficiency and lower temps of the Q9450 and 7% increase clock for clock, I don't know if if its worth it to spend $80 more.
What do you think?