Ad
News

AMD Athlon 64 Venice, San Diego set sale

Published on April 21, 2005

Socket 939 editions of AMD's Athlon 64, based on core SanDiego and Venice cores could go on sale this weekend. Read more

AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ to be priced in range of $139-160

Published on June 29, 2006

In an attempt to compete against Intel's plan to offer dual-core processors at competitive prices, AMD will add the Socket-AM2 Athlon 64 X2 3600+, a 2 GHz Athlon 64 X2 CPU that contains 512 kB level-two (L2) cache, in the fourth quarter of 2006, with the new part to be priced in the $139-160 range, according to sources at Taiwan motherboard makers. Read more

AMD launches Athlon 64 3700+ processor for notebooks

Published on August 17, 2004

AMD today announced a new top-end version of its mobile processors line, The Athlon 64 3700+ "for notebooks" extends the portfolio of processors for desktop replacement devices. The company also announced that it has begun shipping 90 nm mobile processors, formerly code-named Oakville. Read more

AMD introduces low-power 64-bit processors

Published on May 06, 2004

AMD today added two new low-power mobile processor for the thin and light notebook segment. The mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and 2700+ sharply decrease the power consumption of other mobile Athlon 64 processors. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide 2008, Part 4

Published on December 02, 2008

Welcome to part four of our Holiday Gift Guide coverage. This time around, the Tom's Hardware staff picks its favorite components for your wish list rounding out 2008. Read more

4GB Gets Cheap: 9 Dual-Channel Kits Compared

Published on December 01, 2008

Recent price drops have made 4 GB DDR2 dual-channel kits affordable for even the most cost-conscious buyers. We pushed nine models to their limits to determine best value for a broad range of users. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Max core voltage for AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice?
 

Max core voltage for AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Max core voltage for AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice?
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

Hello,

I am overclocking my CPU, therefore, I need to know the maximum vcore I can safely use. AMD's official website sucks and I am unable to find the information. My CPU is AMD Athlon 64 3200+ (default 2000 MHz,200x10) and it has 512 kb cache, E6 stepping and uses 92nm technology.

I am using vcore of 1.575 at the moment and my CPU is not stable at 2.40 GHz (240x10). My goal is 2.40 GHz right now.

Thanks for your help! :)

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

I'd say 1.575 is a little (alot) too high. I'd recommend keeping it below 1.45 volts (really below 1.4 volts stock hsf) if cooling on air. 1.575 is IMO too high for water cooled, but you'd probably be alright. I bet you're not getting to 2.4 b/c your cpu is getting too hot with that voltage and can't stay stable. try clocking it to 2.4 at 1.375 V or 1.4 v and see what happens. more voltage is only the answer if you have adequate cooling

Profile: journeyman
More Information

1.45 is the safe limit 1.5 is the HARD limit

i had my venice at 1.45 volts at 2.9gHz stable with aftermarket cooling.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Couple of questions to help diagnose the problem ...

1) What are your current temperatures? (Bios temp will do)
2) What cooling do you currently have on it?
3) You've set vcore to 1.575v, but what does the hardware monitor in Bios say the CPU is actually getting?

You should easily be able to get 2.4GHz or more out of that chip, so at the moment i'm leaning towards agreeing with sepayne21 that the voltage you're feeding the chip is probably making it too hot with your current cooling for it to run stably.

1.575v is a little bit on the high side, but not as drastically as some people think. Your CPU (and one of my older ones, a 3700+ san diego core) has a default voltage need of 1.35-1.40v, and as long as you have good enough cooling it should be safe to add 0.15v to the top end of that.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

More questions I just remembered...

4) What speed RAM do you have and what speed do you have it set to in Bios?
5) What link speed/HT multiplier do you have set in the Bios?
6) Which motherboard do you have?

Profile: member
More Information

Hi, I don't know if this information is still useful but I thought I'd share it.

I believe your Venice core should be capable of 2.4GHz..2.6GHz and beyond is not uncommon using standard air cooling.

I have the same CPU (retail), and it does 2.5GHz using 1.45v and air cooling.

I'm also assuming you're using DDR-400/PC3200 memory, but there's plenty of leeway if this isn't the case.

OK, just a quick recap on some important settings..

1) CPU core speed = base frequency x multiplier.. 200MHz x 10 = 2.0GHz

2) HT Link speed = based frequency x HT multiplier.. 200MHz x 5 = 1.0GHz (2.0GHz DDR). 2.1GHz is the safe limit.

3) Memory speed = core speed divided by memory divider (10/12/15/20):

2.0GHz / 10 = 200MHz (DDR-400)
2.0GHz / 12 = 166MHz (DDR-333)
2.0GHz / 15 = 133MHz (DDR-266)

4) If using memory in dual-channel mode, its stability can be increase by altering the 1T/2T setting to 2T.


I am confident your vCore setting isn't the problem, and that you're setting it unnecessarily high.
I think your RAM and HT link speeds are too high.


Procedure

How you alter your computer's settings will depend on what motherboard you have. You will be able to alter settings entirely in the BIOS, or have to use a combination of BIOS settings and Windows software.

Ideally you want to do as much as you can in the BIOS, but if that's not possible you still have plenty of flexibility even with the cheap boards. This was the case with my S939 Abit NF-95, and I can overclock the processor in seconds once Windows boots.

Enter the BIOS and..

1) Enter the BIOS and set your vCore to default (if applicable). Reboot.

2) Enter the BIOS again. Set your RAM speed to 166MHz (DDR-333)

3) Set the 1T/2T timing to 2T

3) Set the HT multiplier to x4

4) Increase your base frequency from 200MHz to 240MHz. If you can't do this in the BIOS you'll need to do it in Windows, using ClockGen or similar.

ClockGen and another piece of software called CrysalCPUID can confirm your settings. Crystal also allows you to adjust the vCore from within Windows, which is useful is you do not have the option to do this in the BIOS.

If all is well you should be running at the following settings:

vCore = 1.400v
Core frequency = 2.4GHz
Base frequency = 240MHz
HT link speed = 240 x 4 = 960MHz (1920 DDR)
Memory speed = 2.4GHz / 12 = 200MHz (DDR-400)


If you want your processor to operate faster than 2.4GHz I would recommend starting with a RAM speed of 133MHz.

Here's my current settings, using two sticks of cheap RAM DDR-400 memory, one of which fails at 200MHz:

vCore = 1.450v
Core frequency = 2.4GHz
Base frequency = 266MHz
HT link speed = 266 x 4 = 1064MHz (2128 DDR)
Memory speed = 2.6GHz / 12 = 178MHz (DDR-356)

Sorry if this seems like I'm throwing a lot of figures around, hopefully you should be able to get some joy with your system and whilst using lower voltages. With a good cooler and some decent RAM these systems can really fly, however I would rather aim for an AM2 system that offers cheaper dual-core upgrade options and (65nm) processors that only draw less than 20% more energy than their single-core variants.

Profile: member
More Information

Correction as regards my current settings:

vCore = 1.450v
Core frequency = 2.53GHz (multiplier = x9.5 using CrystalCPUID) <--------
Base frequency = 266MHz
HT link speed = 266 x 4 = 1064MHz (2128 DDR)
Memory speed = 2.6GHz / 12 = 178MHz (DDR-356)

:)


  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Max core voltage for AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice?

Go to:
 

Google Ads