I have a serious Issue with my transfer speed between sata drives and was hoping you could all give me some good places to look for my issue... I was gettign between 16 and 20/MB Sec according to the transfer dialog in Vista this morning while sending about 40 gigs at once with an average file size of around 400-600 megs...
COMPUTER:: (no overclocking on cpus or gpus enabled)
AMD Phenom 9950 (2.6 quad)
8GB G-Skill DDR2 800
Vista 64 Crossfire'd Saphire radeon 4850s (nice ones)
2 WDCaviar 500 GB 16mb cache 7200rpm (siSoft sandra shows them reading good and fast)
BIOSTAR TFORCE TA790GX - MOBO
Cooler master 650w power
Any suggestions or help would be extremely appreciated.
Other issues with the system you may want to know about since I built it a couple months ago are that the graphics adapters don't seem to be performing as well as they should playing Farcry 2 and other games at 1920x.... Weird color filling issues, frame-rate issues, etc.
This was just file data, OS running, moving video files to 2nd HDD to make room in program files dir... all internal drives..
So you're saying that's not bad then..? How not bad - should I be concerned at all? I just thought that 40gigs in moderate file sizes with 7200 rps drives would have been faster and Vista showing 16-20/MB sec was very concerning...
I know that windows confuses the heck out of itself when dealing with large file transfers as far as what the drives are actually doing, and what it shows in the transfer dialog...
If you are correct and my drives are spinning at decent speeds.. I guess I should just go for the Raptors.. i mean.. I have terabytes of media and moving a few hundred gigs is not at all uncommon..
while it may be normal, 20MB/s seems a tad sluggish... Have you installed the latest drivers? more specifically, the latest chipset drivers? on AMD's website, its a pain to navigate but find the chipset section, get the unified driver, and then get the southbridge driver. Maybe that will help.
Byproduct if this would be updated video card drivers too which may fix the weird things you're experiencing in games.
Message edited by weilin on 12-31-2008 at 08:17:38 PM
That seems pretty slow to me. have your drives been defrag'd recently? Are they fairly full? On my system I was getting around 60 between my 400 WD and 1.5 Seagate and around 90 going between my Seagate 1.5s.
Drives that are close to full or heavily fragmented can really slow transfers down.
------------------------------DFI LP UT X58-T3eH8|Core i7 920 @ 4000|TRUE Copper w/TR-FDB-2000 push-pull|G.SKILL PI Black 3x1GB PC3 16000| SeaSonic M12D SS-750|HIS HD 4670 512MB IceQ|4x 1tb WD RE3|1x Dvico FusionHDTV5 Gold 1x DViCO FusionHDTV7 Dual Express|1x WinTV-HVR-2250|FT01-BW
Reply to Ancient_1
The drive I was transferring from was down to about 20 gigs remaining. The other practically empty. Both drives are less than 2 months old. Fragmentation due to file size I tend to have is almost definitely less than 1%
after doing some math... 20mb a sec is pretty slow, thats about how fast my machine transfers USB. (USB for me = 48 gigs in about 45mins, I did this just yesterday transferrring music)
I just did a large transfer from Esata to an internal SATA drive and got about the same speed. Moving 777gigs worth of data the speed averaged 25 -29 mbps based on what Vista was saying. In all it took about 8 - 9 hours. I'm in the same boat as you in thinking that the speeds from one SATA drive to another should be higher....Anymore suggestions?
I've noticed a problem similar to this as well. I have three WD 160GB drive in RAID5, and I just got a 500GB Seagate for storage. If I transfer something over the network (gigabit) from one of my roomates comps, I average about 40 to 60MBs according to vista, but transfering from my array to the Seagate, it starts at 70MBs and quickly drops to around 12MBs. That just doesn't seem right.
I just did a search because I thought my sytyem was moving slow. Just built a basic pc to serve as a media center for my TV and to use to store all my files. First major transfer I did was approx 300gb and took 2.3 hours. That seemed really high to me, but I dont think I have ever moved that amount of data at once, so I dont have a baseline. This is my first Vista box, so its hard for me to judge slow from fast. Being that this pc was created to host all my media, it does worry me a little. The drive I was moving data into was encrypted with TureCrypt, so I imagine that slows it significantly.
Currently I am moving 360gb of non encrypted files from one drive to a seperate one. It gave me an estimate of 1.6 hours at 62.4mb per sec. After reading these posts I found were to get the transfer rate. Wish I had noticed that earlier. Being that my system is very much basic on the hardware end, I would think that anything much under that would be a problem for those that asked. I still feel like this is slow, but as I see, it could be worse.
PC Basics For COmparison
ASUS MB Socket 775 Intel 4 Onboard Sata
Pentium 4 3.0 Socket 775 Single Core Processor (Told you it was basic)
2gb 800fsb Dual Channel Ram
Onboard Audio and Video
2 500gb Seagate Sata 3.0 Harddrives (1 is 16mb the other 32mb)
2 1tb WD Green Sata 3.0 Drive (32mb)
Hope some of that helps as your posts did help me.
i too have noticed slow HDD speeds , i have 2 ea WD 250 sata 2 HDD. they say speeds of up to 300MB/s but according to HD Tune i am only getting a max of 63MB/s and a burst speed of 128MB/s, the mobo is a MSI K9A Platinum with an AMD SB600 sata controller capable of 300MB/s , so i am at a loss as to why such slow speeds? all drivers are installed for the mobo , checked with WD no jumpers mean full speed and there are none on HDD's they are close to full but the speeds were the same even when empty and i defrag at least once every 2 weeks or upon uninstall or reinstall of anything. so i am at a loss on this issue also checked the bios settings and all seem to be set to auto so ??? any help would be nice thx
@Andy...A common problem for me in server '03 x64 (especially over network )...try a little program called "Teracopy" when you transfer the big stuff. It's improved my transfer speeds, but don't expect any miracles....From my understanding, the problem lies with file copies that exceed system resources. There are registry hacks that do what teracopy does, but they are always in effect and suck for smaller copies. With teracopy you only use it when you need it ( drag and drop ).
@rugerSix....nothing wrong with those speeds...the 300MB/s they are refering to is the max transfer rate of the SATA II interface, not the drive itself. even the fastest drives cannot sustain this, but SSD's are getting close.
so im guessing that they mean the total transfer speed the sata controller will handle is 300MB/s, ie 3 or 4 HDD's @say 60 MB/s would be a total of 240MB/s with 4 drive's ? kind of like a USB host controller, it only allocates a said amount of bandwidth for each port but the total is a lot higher? any way thank's for your help and i am watching prices for those SSD's will be able to afford them soon. just waiting for the less then a buck a GIG rule for 250GB and above drives, getting close. i remember when just 2 years ago a 32GB SSD was almost $2,000 ! lol now i think you can get a 32 GB SSD for around $150 or less.
so im guessing that they mean the total transfer speed the sata controller will handle is 300MB/s, ie 3 or 4 HDD's @say 60 MB/s would be a total of 240MB/s with 4 drive's ? kind of like a USB host controller, it only allocates a said amount of bandwidth for each port but the total is a lot higher? any way thank's for your help and i am watching prices for those SSD's will be able to afford them soon. just waiting for the less then a buck a GIG rule for 250GB and above drives, getting close. i remember when just 2 years ago a 32GB SSD was almost $2,000 ! lol now i think you can get a 32 GB SSD for around $150 or less.
close. the sata 2 spec says 3gb/s. that is devided amongst the devices on that sata controller based on need. a single drive can theoretically push 3gb/s even if there are 3 other devices hooked up as long as they are idle. there is no cap per drive just the total bandwidth to the bus.
rugersix: hold off till slc based drives come down. the mlc based drives suck when dealing with more than 1 io operation at a time but are pretty cheap nowadays.
well thank you 4 your feedback. i am still kind of bumed , the HDD box says 300 MB/s and the mobo is 300MB/s and i get 130MB/s burst and about 63MB/s average......... o well. i think 4 now i will try a few 150 GB WD raptors in raid 0+1 and see what i get. with my system im waiting on my HDD's all the time. thanks again 4 your help
---------------------------------------------
Specs.
AMD X2 6000+ Dual Core @ 3.2Ghz
MSI K9A Platinum AM2 / AMD 580X NB and AMD SB600
4GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800/6400 D/C
Visiontek ATI HD 4870 512 MB GDDR5 @750/1005
On Board Realtek HD 7.1 sound
2Ea. WD SATA2 250GB 7200/16MB HDD's 1Ea. 750GB Maxtor USB 1Ea. 350GB Seagate ATA.
Win XP Pro SP3.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.