Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » HELP!!!!!! Is my processor bootlenecking my new 8800GT
 

HELP!!!!!! Is my processor bootlenecking my new 8800GT

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : HELP!!!!!! Is my processor bootlenecking my new 8800GT
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Guys,

Need some expert help!!!

I just bought a new BFG 8800GT OC 512mb but I can't get not even close to the 3DMark06 results posted in the Tom's Video Chats.

Here are my specs:

Athlon 4600X2 S939
MB Asus A8N-SLI
2gb DDR400 dual channel (4x512mb)
2x 80gb SATA Samsung in RAID0
1x 250gb SATA2 Samsung
1x CD-RW LG
1x DVD-RAM LG
SB X-FI Xgamer
PSU Hyper Type-R 580W Modular (SLI Certified)
All in Air/Stock Cooling
BFG 8800GT OC 512MB
Vista 32bit
nVidia Driver 169.28


Watching Tom's charts, 3DMark06 @ 1024x768 noAA, Trilinear is reaching 5359 in SM2 and 6023 in HDR/SM3 with the nearest card in the list.

My best results in my rig are near 3800 for SM2 and 4600 for SM3!!!!

I don't know what to do! I know that Tom's Rig for testing is better than mine is, but I wasn't expecting such a difference! Is my processor/mb/memory bootlenecking my card? Am I doing something wrong?

PLEASE! Give me some help! I'm stuck and I don't know what I will do to fix this...

By the way, I'm not sure if it's relevant or not, but I'm running 3DMark06 1.1.0 while Tom's charts are in 1.0.2...

Thanks a lot in advance!!!!!

VFMardegan

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Sorry, my bad... it's bottlenecking and not bootlenecking...

Profile: stranger
More Information

3dmark06 includes a cpu test witch is a major part of your score...
thats why everyone is still using 3dmark05 ... it gives you a more accurate
score of what your card can do..

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the note skippyjojimbob. But I did not run the CPU test, these are only the GFX bench for SM2 and SM3 (my understanding... I might be wrong).

Don't know what to do... Maybe formatting the whole thing? Live with it? I'm desperate and clueless in this one...

Profile: addict
More Information

Since you just posted the SM2 and SM3 scores, I am apt to say that YOUR GPU, NOT CPU, is underperforming.

Likely causes:

* GPU fan is not working fast enough - use Rivatuner or maybe ATi Tool to increase fan speed.
* GPU fan is at full speed - poor case flow causes overheating.
* Bad drivers?
* Since you're using Vista, the Aero interface could lower your scores, I think....
* Other cases I can't think of right now.


Message edited by PCKid777 on 01-19-2008 at 06:56:06 PM
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

How is your system performing in the games you play? If it is doing well, don't worry about the benchmarks.


---------------
E8400-stock, GA-P35-DS3R(rev2.1), Corsair 4x2gb 6400C5, EVGA 8800GTS-512-G92, Vista home premium-64-bit, WD velociraptor-300gb, PC P&C silencer-610, Antec SOLO, 2 x Samsung 275T, Samsung-203b-dvd
Profile: stranger
More Information

My main concern is regarding Crysis and UT3.

I have seen many people playing Crysis in 1280x1024 on high settings DX10, some even with AA turned on... I am playing 1366x768, no AA, medium settings and still I get several slowdowns during play. If I turn some of the settings to high (shaders, objects detail, textures and sound) I am averaging 20-25...

UT3 maxxed out (no AA) in the same resolution has some major slowdowns during the game...

Given the posts that I've read about these games, I'm far away from what usually I could get...

Thanks,

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Turn on the performance monitor. Run the problem game, and when the problem happens, look at the performance history. If you see a very high cpu utilization, then the cpu is the culprit. Look also at the page fault rate for inadequate memory. Look at the hard drive response time stats. Raid-0 is generally not helpful for games.
Lastly, look for any other running tasks that might be interfering.


---------------
E8400-stock, GA-P35-DS3R(rev2.1), Corsair 4x2gb 6400C5, EVGA 8800GTS-512-G92, Vista home premium-64-bit, WD velociraptor-300gb, PC P&C silencer-610, Antec SOLO, 2 x Samsung 275T, Samsung-203b-dvd
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks geofelt,

Will try this now... Meanwhile, anyone with more ideas? Or a system similar to mine, so I can check if my scores are ok?

Thanks,

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

VFMardegan wrote :

Thanks geofelt,

Will try this now... Meanwhile, anyone with more ideas? Or a system similar to mine, so I can check if my scores are ok?

Thanks,


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3618523


---------------
P35-DS3L l E8400 @ 3.6Ghz l OCZ Vendetta 2 l 4GB G.Skill 8000PQ@1000mhz 4:5 l WD3200AAKS 320GB l Evga 8800GT SC 713/1782/1998 l AC Accelero Twin Turbo w/unisinks l Creative SB X-Fi Xtreme Music l Corsair HX520 l Antec Sonata III 500 l Vista Home Premium
Profile: addict
More Information

VFMardegan wrote :

My main concern is regarding Crysis and UT3.

I have seen many people playing Crysis in 1280x1024 on high settings DX10, some even with AA turned on... I am playing 1366x768, no AA, medium settings and still I get several slowdowns during play. If I turn some of the settings to high (shaders, objects detail, textures and sound) I am averaging 20-25...

UT3 maxxed out (no AA) in the same resolution has some major slowdowns during the game...

Given the posts that I've read about these games, I'm far away from what usually I could get...

Thanks,



Well... Not all systems are built equally. Its hard to compare your performance to another persons because its apples and oranges. They might have the same video card but may also be running DDR2/3 memory, Core 2 Duo/Quad, and many systems may have been overclocked.

I have a Core 2 Quad Q6700 and 8800GT at stock frequencies but I can run Crysis (haven't played the entire demo yet) at 1280x1024 on all high. At 2xAA I definitely notice some drops in FPS but playable without AA its very playable so far pretty smooth for the most part. I dont know how many FPS I'm getting But literally I've only played the demo for about 10 mins so I can't really make a fair judgement.


Message edited by pchoi04 on 01-19-2008 at 10:54:38 PM
hacking your computer
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Exactly... Not all systems are built the same. Not to mention you are on a socket939 with ddr1. A bit older and little underpowered than the new systems.


Message edited by marvelous2 11 on 01-19-2008 at 11:10:58 PM

---------------
Asus P5B vanilla with E6300 B2 stepping @ 3.5
3 gigs Micron D9
EVGA 8800gs 741/1782/1058
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ew-benches

Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » HELP!!!!!! Is my processor bootlenecking my new 8800GT
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Intel expands network processor line

Published on October 19, 2004

With a goal of boosting already robust network processor market segment sales, Intel today announced two new families of network processor units (NPUs) for traditional communications applications and for the emerging embedded networking segment. Read more

Graphics: $100 GeForce 9600GSO by Forsa, Passively Cooled 8800GT by ECS

Published on June 04, 2008

There isn’t much news on the graphics side at the Computex showfloors, as both AMD and Nvidia are not yet ready with their next generation products. Yet we found two interesting products. Read more

Azul Systems to use TSMC 90nm process for 48-core processor

Published on March 28, 2006

Azul Systems today announced that it will use TSMC's advanced 90nm process for the Vega 2, its next-generation 48-core processor. Read more

Via Launches Nano Processor

Published on May 29, 2008

Via Technologies is ramping up its efforts to take on chip giant Intel. The newly unveiled Nano processor has Via aiming directly at Intel’s Atom processor. The x86-compatible Nano processor is Via’s first 64-bit superscalar processors from the company’s Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more