Last questions about the E2160 before ordering.

Last questions about the E2160:

1. Will I be able to run the high end games, like Crysis, without OCing? The Crysis requirements say 2.2 or better.

2. I can afford the E2200 if anybody if anybody has any comments on that. And if I stick with the GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3L for my MB and run a stock fan for awhile I can free up that money toward and even better CPU in the 4000 series.

I will be running the GeForce 8800GT 512MB, with Kingston HyperX 2GB DDR2 800 (PC2 6400). I haven't decided on the MB yet but at least it's down to 2 options. GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3L or the ASUS P5K-E.

I do want to stay on budget but if I can't run good games with the E2160 or E2200 not clocked, I'll consider the 4000. I am partial to the ASUS P5K-E so I'd be giving that up to.

3. I can save a bit on the 8800GT 256MB but not enough to make it worth it (IMO) I think that's it. I'll be ordering in the next few weeks.

Thanks, in advance.

Good stuff. Thanks.

I've used the DS3l and think its a solid board. I'd spend the extra couple bucks for the e2200. I've been think of getting this myself. They are likely binned higher than the e2160, and the higher multiplier means you can OC higher with lower fsb. This means you will very likely OC the e2200 higher than a e2160. You should be able to OC the e2200 to 3ghz with the stock cooler. And with a good cooler like the U120X, you could get 3.6ghz.

Any comments on the 4000 series possibility? It seems like a big increase in stock performance at a reasonable price. But I don't know, all my reading has been on MB lately but I just started thinking about shedding some cash to use on the Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Allendale. Let me know what you think.

If it's not worth it, hey I won't bother. The more I read the more I can justify spending more money. If I wait a month I might be able to get into the 6000 series. So comment on that and I'll be able to make a decision today or tomorrow. Party!

You could get 3.6 GHz. You might get a bum chip and get 3.0 GHz. Either way I think a higher FSB = more performance in general so I go with lower multis. In addition to this.. the 65nm process has gotten so nuts the binning almost doesn't matter anymore. Most E2160s could bin as E2200s. We already talked about the E2180 issue and how it's odd the 2160 seems to OC better on average. I just don't see the reason to spend more money when the same OCs are achievable (within 100-200 MHz). Such as.. why would I have gotten a Q6700 at an extra $200 when it would OC to the same relative point as my Q6600 on air.

Anyways.. The E4x00 series offers 3-5% improvement clock for clock over the E2xx0 series. I don't think it's worth it if you are willing to overclock.

You had a budget, stick to it. P5K-E and an E2160 will go great together.

Because the E6600 is old and they want to get rid of them. Also it has a 1066 FSB= better for OCing

My bad, forgot to mention that part

If you are spending anywhere close to $200 on a dual core, go http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115037

Really? Was I? Because I'm pretty sure you were when you said how the E2200 OCs. Unless of course you own one.

I had the Captain Obvious title already. I don't need it from you, it'll be ok.

Edit: And the reason I said that, is this guy is new to OCing. He might not know.

More options huh? Like... 272*11, 300*10, or 333x9. I'll give you 2 guesses which would offer the most performance in synthetic read/write memory benchmarks.

By the way, have you happen to read or seen the potential problems some people have had with the E2180 or did you just ignore it? It's not like Intel changed the chip. The E2200 Bin has been there all along. It's the same M0 stepping as it always has been. They just decided to offer another level of competition.

And no, there isn't a big difference. If you are looking at a budget mine might allow me to spend an extra $200, his might not let him spend an extra $20. Also it's only $15 (nit picking I know). However it's still money wasted.