GDDR2 vs GDDR3

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : GDDR2 vs GDDR3
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi guys, Quick question.

I'm building a decent System for the sole pupouse of a LAN im going to next month, so obviously i dont want to spend too much.

Now, i've got the choice of graphics cards and as always, im stuck between systems.

I've decided to pick up a 8600GT, but looking around on ebuyer, theres several choices on what to go for!

First one: POV 8600GT - 512 DDR2 - 128bit http://www.ebuyer.com/product/133276
Second one: Inno3D 8600GT - 256 GDDR3 - 128bit http://www.ebuyer.com/product/126974

Now, obviously theres a difference between them, one has 512DDR2 and 256DDR3.

What one will out perform the other? And whats more important in GFX memory? Size or Speed?

Thanks in advance..

Rich - UK

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

...I like you
Profile: addict
More Information

It depends on what you'll be playing. If you plan on playing something with higher-rez or that takes a lot of memory, you might want to take a slight initial performance hit with GDDR2 512mb. You will experience the same FPS with the 512mb three hours after starting the game, whereas the performance increase of the GDDR3 256mb will only last until the memory is filled up, then your FPS will drop a lot because of textures being paged to system RAM, which is considerably slower.

I had that issue with my slightly faster 7900GT KO SC 256mb card. Oblivion was great for a few minutes but then slowed way down after a bit because Oblivion uses over 300mb video RAM. I got a slightly slower 7900GT KO 512 card, lost 1 or 2fps, but it was more consistent.

Hope this helps!


---------------
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" -- Jim Elliott
Profile: stranger
More Information

Well, the games are stuff like C:SS, CoD4, Unreal 2k7...

But i want to start playing some decent DX10 games, so i'm just trying to see what suits better.

Might be best to go for the 512 Version realy, as its hours of playing rather than a few hours at a time or so.

...I like you
Profile: addict
More Information

If you can find one with 256bit memory, that will help a lot too regardless of clock frequency.


---------------
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" -- Jim Elliott
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information


Im guessing its the old budget thing but you wont get far with a 8600 card, really would sugest getting a oc 8600GTS as a minimum if your serious about playing DX10 games. Do you have a budget in mind ?
Mactronix

Do not eat the styrofoam
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Or HD 3850 512MB. That card is enormous bang for the buck. It's sometimes twice as fast as the 8600GT.

Profile: addict
More Information

mactronix wrote :

Im guessing its the old budget thing but you wont get far with a 8600 card, really would sugest getting a oc 8600GTS as a minimum if your serious about playing DX10 games. Do you have a budget in mind ?
Mactronix




Perhaps the minimum performance goal should be equivalent to an 8600gts, but for the price of a GTS he could easily get a hd3850. In any event the 8600gt would be vastly inadequate for a LAN gaming rig in my eyes.


---------------
Q6600 @ 3.2ghz w/ Tuniq Tower 120 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L |
2gb Super Talent PC6400 | BFG 8800GT OC 512mb (740/1854/1980) w/ Accelero S1 Turbo |
Corsair 450VX PSU | Cooler Master Elite 330 Case | Windows XP Pro | 3dMark06 14,716
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information


Thanks for putting me straight on that TurdBurglar, I was thinking just in terms of performance and not Price/Performance. :(
To the op
One very good demonstration of why you should always get a second opinion :D
Mactronix


Go to:
Add a reply
 

Google Ads
Ad