Geforce 9 rumors

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Geforce 9 rumors

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Whatever happened to the card that was supposed to "have over 1 TFLOPS power, 65nm proccess..."? Where did this all start?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

seems the only company that has been living up to its promises recently is...as much as i hate to say it...intel.

Reply to eagles453809

Well.. the 3870X2 is a 55nm process card that has over 1 TeraFlop of power.

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

Intel, bah, AMD rox in low priced items. But considering my school wont touch em, I'm a little worried.

Reply to Rockstone1

Rockstone1:

For a desktop for school teachers/profs to use an AMD is fine. Cheap. Slow. Are you gonna play games or just grade papers?

Reply to Conumdrum

i wouldnt say that amd's are slow, they just arent as fast as intel :P

as for gaming, i have a 3800 x2 at 2.0 and it runs just fine with my 8800gt although i am going to be upgrading to a core 2/core 2 quad in a couple months.

Reply to eagles453809

Geforce is no longer in any "rush" to make anything better. After all they are not in a race with themselves. No need to beat the #1 card/company....Geforce.
Same with Intel, no need to try to outdo ... Intel.
This is what happens with a monopoly. Pray amd and ati actually push for better/faster products again.

Reply to computertech82

computertech82 wrote :

Geforce is no longer in any "rush" to make anything better. After all they are not in a race with themselves. No need to beat the #1 card/company....Geforce.
Same with Intel, no need to try to outdo ... Intel.
This is what happens with a monopoly. Pray amd and ati actually push for better/faster products again.



You do realize the 3870X2 out performs the Ultra in most situations, and nVidia's answer, the 9800 GX2 is looking to underperform due to heat issues. 550 MHz core? No thanks.

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

if ati goes under then we are all screwed i dont wanna pay over 1k for graphics cards :(

------------------------------ Amd Anthlon x2 4800 @ 3.0 Ghz..........2 gb g skill ddr2 1066 ram
Gigabyte GA-m57sli-54..........Seagate 320gb 7200rpm
XFX Geforce 8800 gts 512 Core: 780 Memory:2200

Reply to neisonator

I'd take a 550Mhz core any day if i get a second graphics card free with it.

Reply to starcraftfanatic

You won't because no one will develop software that requires a 1k videocard.

Reply to steven zwickel

starcraftfanatic wrote :

I'd take a 550Mhz core any day if i get a second graphics card free with it.



Uh.. MSRP is going to be 450-550 probably. I'd rather have 2 800 MHz 8800 GTSs. I just can't quad SLI those.

So in that case, I'd rather have 2 3870X2s since CFX seems to scale better than SLI in most situations.

Of course it's all just personal preference, I'm just saying ATi is in no way that far behind nVidia. They are actually right on their heals (finally).

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr
- 0 +

Is Quad SLI going to be a valid option? I've heard rumors about it being OK and others that it's no good....

Reply to Waspy
- 0 +

Waspy wrote :

Is Quad SLI going to be a valid option? I've heard rumors about it being OK and others that it's no good....



Sure... Quad SLI worked great for nVidia last time around (sarcasm) :D.

Quote :

I'd take a 550Mhz core any day if i get a second graphics card free with it.



even if both the graphics cards are underperforming simply because of a (fixable) heat issue?

Quote :


Geforce is no longer in any "rush" to make anything better. After all they are not in a race with themselves. No need to beat the #1 card/company....Geforce.



Last time I checked Geforce was a brand and not a company :non: (sorry that just got on my nerves)

Quote :

if ati goes under then we are all screwed i dont wanna pay over 1k for graphics cards :(



ATI is starting to bounce back, they've had great Driver support over the past few months (much better than nVidia) and for them to put out a 2x1PCB card that isnt just a NOVELTY. That's great. and drivers that work will only make that better.

Quote :


Same with Intel, no need to try to outdo ... Intel.



This statement isn't exactly true... look what intel has given us over the past few years: they've pulled themselves out of the performance hole they were in with netburst, they've successfully gotten 45nm chips into the retail market WELL before AMD, and they're right on schedule with Nehalem, which some are speculating to be even more of a performance leap than Netburst => Core 2, for H208. So I would argue that Intel IS outdoing itself in most cases.

------------------------------ Q6600 (lapped IHS+ HSF) @ 3.55Ghz 1.425v (BIOS) TT-120
Foxconn 8800GTX(648/1560/2000)
http://www.computerbase.de/bild/news/18649/2/ <==EXCITED! :D
Fan roundup: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] p?t=170224
Reply to Valtiel

$300 bucks gets you a 3870X2. This is supposed to be on par with the 9800GX2 as it's also slated to be 30% better than the ULTRA. $300 9800GX2? I think not.

------------------------------ AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 2.27 (Crappy Mobo)
7600GT @ 626/1.51 '05 Score: 6500
4GB DDR2 884 @ 5-5-5-15 (This RAM is for my new system in the summer, using now cause I bought it early-had an insane deal for it)
Samsung HD160JJ
Reply to Loser777

starcraftfanatic wrote :

Whatever happened to the card that was supposed to "have over 1 TFLOPS power, 65nm proccess..."? Where did this all start?

If they came out with a card of that specks nvidia would have no sales years after.

------------------------------ WAITING FOR THE NEXT MOMENT TO STRIKE

 

Reply to gomerpile

- 0 +

Loser777 wrote :

$300 bucks gets you a 3870X2. This is supposed to be on par with the 9800GX2 as it's also slated to be 30% better than the ULTRA. $300 9800GX2? I think not.

 


The prices I've seen are between $480 and $665. I see that you like ATI and I wish them the best but until both cards are out and benched against each other your just spewing fud.

------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
Reply to ausch30
- 0 +

^^^ this is truth but prices are bound to come down within a few months. Only a few etailers have them at the moment and price gouging is the usual when a new card comes out. Still, $480 for better-than-ultra performance isn't too shabby. Plus, 2 GPUS on one PCB is COOL :D!

------------------------------ Q6600 (lapped IHS+ HSF) @ 3.55Ghz 1.425v (BIOS) TT-120
Foxconn 8800GTX(648/1560/2000)
http://www.computerbase.de/bild/news/18649/2/ <==EXCITED! :D
Fan roundup: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] p?t=170224
Reply to Valtiel
- 0 +

Loser777 wrote :

$300 bucks gets you a 3870X2. This is supposed to be on par with the 9800GX2 as it's also slated to be 30% better than the ULTRA. $300 9800GX2? I think not.


$300? I think not.

------------------------------ P35-DS3L Rev 2 bios F9C l E8400 @ 3.6Ghz @ 1.232v l OCZ Vendetta 2 /LGA775 Bolt-Thru l 4GB G.Skill 8800PI@1000mhz 4:5 @ 1.87v l WD3200AAKS 320GB l Evga 8800GTS 512 l X-Fi Xtreme Music l Corsair HX520 l Antec Sonata III 500 l Vista32 SP2 l Win7 X64 7600
Reply to kpo6969
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Geforce 9 rumors
Go to:

There are 1005 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them