Not just small fries – Intel’s Skulltrail platform sports 8 cores running at 4 GHz each and uses a quad-core memory interface. Developed out of fear of AMD’s Phenom, Intel’s fastest hardware meets underdeveloped software.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/0 [...] index.html

Poke

Bargepole

Fugger just ran 3DMark06 on his OC'd skulltrail system with 8800 Ultras in SLI.



Original Thread..
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] p?t=176049


Futuremark Page...
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5070435

3DMark Score 29905 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score 11282 Marks

SM 3.0 Score 12529 Marks

CPU Score 12293 Marks


I see him teaming up with k|ngp|n again and just demolishing their current 3DMark records.

OMG!!!! I could rip and encode 8 dvd once with DivX. Please tell me this is so, so I can wake up.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipse [...] =3216&p=10

But its crap for many games as the memory latency is a joke.

It is a monster workstation though !!

For the money, better off just building an actual workstation with a mobo that has more than 4 DIMMS.

They cracked on quad FX because IT SUCKED.

Or could it be you had too much of whatever you're smoking, and forgot that Quad FX was demolished by Intel's first generation quad core?

I am impressed though ... it is closer to the gamers dream.

It is a pity they didn't fix the ram issue ... but then the QF sucked power up like a dog and had it's own issues with IPC.

If anyone gets it right soon I have no doubt it will be Intel.

In the meantime there is no reason to buy it over a souped up single socket Yorkie with all of the fruit ... and half the cost.

The broodlings dance feverishly round the flames ...

Is all we know is that most games werent optimized for this technology?

Anyone getting hard over this thinking about gaming should start thinking about my naked grandma instead.

The whole review was a waste of time, in my opinion. Why bother with something that doesn't do anything practical, as far as gamers are concerned? Unless that was the point, to make gamers aware of how bad this setup is, as well as how expensive.

All this proves is that software is so far behind modern computer tech there is no reason to upgrade to more cores. Skulltrail and it's FB-DIMM crap is useless unless you're a Cinebench whore. 8 Cores is only useful in a workstation environment and that may hold true for the next 2 years. Even Nehalem in it's 8 core revision will mostly go unused despite the 2009 time frame. Software simply has not caught up and they're still taking their merry time to do so. We have had multiple cores for years and even 64bit capability before that, and we still have not seen software that fully uses generation old technology. Gaming is actually better on single CPU systems simply due to the lower latency as compared to Skulltrail. Skulltrail is probably doomed and until Quick Path hits, multi-socket Intel systems will not be the way to go. Skulltrail = FAIL.

I agree with wingless. Software developers are way WAY behind the game here. They've known about dual core coming for at least 3.5 years, and dual cores have been available on market for at least 2. And yet we're still not seeing any games that utilize more than one core? Lazy lazy lazy.

Yes. softwarez developers liek teh NSA.
8corewarz. morris would be proud.