jimmysmitty :
Its hard to say really. I mean it looks fake to me but could be real if Intel is trying to at least keep Nehalem on schedule.
I for one doubt it due to the fact that with Penryn around this time until about September Intel would release their own in house benches. Then around late September / early October the enthusiast sites such as THG and XBit got their own ES's to play with.
So don't expect anything unless its an official release from Intel. but this seems to look like the performance jump Intel expects. I hope it is better than this.
Well look how long the 65nm Pentium 4 and Pentium D lineup lasted, the last of the series before a overhaul. Intel typically uses a manufacturing process to test a series and then uses the results to make there next gen chips, there using Core 2's to test it and work out any minor details (eg G0 65nm Core2's are cooler and clock higher), before the real deal.
On the other hand, the screen shots of CPU-Z are interesting, it detects the FSB as 3 x 444mhz rather then a QDR setup (4 x 333), is this true or perhaps it cant read the new interlink design, and the cache levels (L1) are the same, and i thought i heard that Intels next gen would have less transistors then current Peryn's because of the IMC, the cache wouldnt be needed as much (unlike now with the limited FSB design), but then again if thats 4 cores (monolithic) with 8mb shared then thats 33% less then a Peryn (12mb) with an IMC, thats still loads of cache.
2.66ghz is also sounding healthy, we could be in for mid 3ghz monsters pushing ~5 seconds, its amazing if true, a P4 with LN could barely break the 20 second barrier @ 7.4ghz, this has 4 times the cores (super pi is single threaded) and air cooled (well i presume it still is
), this is going to be a monster.
Speculation only, of course, if it were true, only time will tell whether it is, but it does make sense.