Which OC do you prefer?

[andregoujon]

Hello,
I'm ocing my computer. It's a MSI K9N4 SLI with AMD 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane), 2 GB RAM Kingston DDR2 667 MHz.

Considering the following OC settings as stable, which do you prefer?

1) FSB: 223, CPU: 2,13 GHz, RAM: 747 MHz 4-4-4-12

2) FSB: 244, CPU: 2,32 GHz, RAM: 464 MHz 3-3-3-9

As you can see, in option two I loose RAM speed but I got 200 MHz in the processor.

Which option is better to video editing, games, etc?

In both cases, 5,9 is the score of Vista in the memory section.

 

[cjl]

Can you run #2, but loosen up the memory timings to get it up a bit faster?

 

[B-Unit]

IMO #2 is your winner, although the RAM speed from #1 is pretty impressive.

 

[themyrmidon]

Should also give the volts

 

[andregoujon]

Both settings are at default volts options; 1.3 volts.
Now I testing a new one:

3) CPU: 2.4, RAM: 507 MHz and default voltage. The FSB is now at 253. At FSB 264 system is unstable.

About the memory speed, yes, is impressive considering that my RAM modules are ValueRAM only.

So, the tasks (like games, play music, transform from avi to DVD, etc) benefits more from processor speed than rather RAM speed?

Thanks!

 

[blackwidow_rsa]

Amd has a very efficient memory controlled, i say cpu speed will do the most