Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » translating the THG CPU Chart
 

translating the THG CPU Chart




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : translating the THG CPU Chart
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

n00b builder here. It's not my first one, but the first one I really want to do right. I've been looking at the CPU chart and I can't find a key that tells me what the numbers after the processor name mean.
Example: Core 2 Duo E6750 (Conroe, 2666/333, P35, 800)

Conroe obviously the name of the core
2666 Is this the processor being a 1333 (it is) x2 for Dual Core?
333 I have no idea what this is.
P35 would that be the Intel chipset of the mobo used for the test?
800 I'm assuming 800 is the RAM speed, but don't know how that translates into what I see when shopping for it.

While I'm on it, The E6750 looks like a clear winner over the Quad Core Q6600 on the charts for the gaming demos, but the Q6600 looks like it's being worked up as the CPU of choice in some of the THG articles. Why? I understand 4 v 2 cores, but everything I've read says nothings using the 4 cores so why bother? Is it more OC'able than the E6750? I noticed that the Q6600's numbers (2400/266, P35, 800) on the chart are lower than the E6750. Does that indicate that it's doing only slightly less in performance with lower speeds?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Conroe = name of the core (like you said)
2666 = the processor is running at 2666Mhz, or 2.66Ghz.
333 = FSB speed, which means FSB is running at 1333Mhz (since FSB is quad-pumped, so 333 x 4)
P35 = Intel chipset. Nvidia chipset go by 6x0 or 7x0.
800 = DDR2 RAM speed used in testing.

 

The reason why Q6600 is the choice of many THG user is that, it is a mid-range quad core (270 USD), and although running at 2.4Ghz stock, it can be easily overclocked to 3.0~3.2Ghz. So having a quad core that's capable of running (sometimes) faster than some dual cores definitely is a plus.

 

As for the number for Q6600, Q6600's FSB is slower than E6750 (266 vs. 333). However, this doesn't affect its performance much (1~2%). Therefore, you can pretty much eliminate that.

 

EDIT: DDR2-800 is pretty much sufficient for your use, unless you're looking at overclocking your CPU over FSB 400Mhz (which most of the time requires substantial voltage increase). So, if you're not ready to venture into moderate to heavy overclocking, DDR2-800 is plenty sufficient.


Message edited by yomamafor1 on 02-12-2008 at 04:09:18 PM

---------------
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/TXSuperFly03/478x88copy.png
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks.
How is the processor running at 2666? According the specs on the E6750, it's 1333 MHz. Obviously 1333 x 2 = 2666, but where does the "x2" come from?

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

monkeylizard wrote :

Thanks.
How is the processor running at 2666? According the specs on the E6750, it's 1333 MHz. Obviously 1333 x 2 = 2666, but where does the "x2" come from?


The 1333Mhz is its FSB speed. Since FSB is quad pumped, FSB clock is running at 333Mhz. E6750 has a mulitplier of 8, so 333Mhz x 8 = 2,666Mhz, or 2.66Ghz.

So take E6850 for example, it has a multiplier of 9, with the same FSB clock. Therefore, 333Mhz x 9 = 3.0Ghz.

There's no x2.


---------------
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/TXSuperFly03/478x88copy.png
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

One thing that may help:

 

Usually the CPU has a rated FSB. In that case 1333. That is basically quad pumped.

 

1333/4=333mhz

 

So the CPU will have its stock multi, so it would be for the E6750 - 8.

 

333x8=2664mhz or 2.66ghz

 

So for another example:

 

E4400 FSB rated 800mhz:

 

800/4=200
200x10=2000mhz or 2ghz


Message edited by Grimmy on 02-12-2008 at 05:18:12 PM
Resident Jerk
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

monkeylizard wrote :

Thanks.
How is the processor running at 2666? According the specs on the E6750, it's 1333 MHz. Obviously 1333 x 2 = 2666, but where does the "x2" come from?



The X2 is actually only used for AMD. It's the name of their processors and just denotes the Cores. Athlon 64 X2 = A dual core Athlon 64. The quad core AMD is the Phenom X4.

Intel uses the name Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad (2 and 4 cores respectively).


---------------
TeamBAG Member

Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » translating the THG CPU Chart

Google Ads
Ad
News

Hynix Encounters Issue With 66 Nm DRAM Production

Published on April 03, 2008

Yield problems with Hynix Semiconductor's 66nm production are said to have resulted in 30 million defective 1Gb DDR2 chips, translating to about 10% to its output, according to industry sources at downstream players. Read more

PC Vendors Have No Incentive To Replenish DRAM Inventory

Published on August 04, 2008

DRAM contract prices are likely to post a 2. Read more

CES 2007: Patriot to demonstrate 1302 MHz memory modules

Published on January 02, 2007

Pre CES 2007 coverage - Patriot is joining the latest DDR2 memory frenzy. Following Corsair's PC2-8888 Dominator (1111 MHz), OCZ's liquid cooled PC2-9200 FlexXLC (1150 MHz) and Kingston's HyperX PC2-9600 (1200 MHz), the company said it would show PC2-10100 devices with a clock speed of 1302 MHz at the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more

Stalker: Clear Sky--Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more