Hi All,
I've been a Toms Hardware fan for quite some years now, and this is sadly my first post.
I need some professional advice in regards to memory clocks, and core clocks. Long story short, I'm currently running a Dell 24" monitor at 1900x1200 resolution, and I'm sick and tired of struggling for frames, and not being able to pump-up the eye-candy to maximum AA/AF in games.
Now, gaming is my one passion in life, therefore it's important to me that I can get a lot of frames, and also enjoy the best graphics possible. With that said - it's time for an upgrade.
Firstly - I am looking at purchasing a GTX 280, which I believe is the best-card on the market at present?
Secondly, I'm trying to decide the flavor of card to buy (XFX, Microstar etc). I am absolutely confused over the most important measurement to look for... memory clock speed, or core clock speed? And - exactly HOW MUCH difference does an alteration in clock speeds actually matter? Does it justify the price difference.
Here's the 3 versions of the GTX 280 I am considering:
NZ$693.79 Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 1024MB DDR3
Graphics Clock 602 MHz
Processor Clock 1296 MHz
Memory Clock 1107 MHz
NZ$904.49 XFX GX-280N-ZDD9 XXX edition Geforce GTX 280 1GB GDDR3
Core Clock 670MHz shader 1458MHz
Memory Clock 2.5GHz
NZ$968.96 Microstar GF GTX 280 OverClocked 1GB DDR3 512-bit 650/2300M
This card is apparently factory over-clocked.
So firstly - why the price difference? What is the differences between these cards, and does it really make a substantial impact on performance, and therefore justify the price difference?
NOTE: I am not able to run an SLI configuration, as I only have 1x PCI-e slot, therefore this alternative is not possible.
Yours, utterly confused,
Acropoli
I've been a Toms Hardware fan for quite some years now, and this is sadly my first post.
I need some professional advice in regards to memory clocks, and core clocks. Long story short, I'm currently running a Dell 24" monitor at 1900x1200 resolution, and I'm sick and tired of struggling for frames, and not being able to pump-up the eye-candy to maximum AA/AF in games.
Now, gaming is my one passion in life, therefore it's important to me that I can get a lot of frames, and also enjoy the best graphics possible. With that said - it's time for an upgrade.
Firstly - I am looking at purchasing a GTX 280, which I believe is the best-card on the market at present?
Secondly, I'm trying to decide the flavor of card to buy (XFX, Microstar etc). I am absolutely confused over the most important measurement to look for... memory clock speed, or core clock speed? And - exactly HOW MUCH difference does an alteration in clock speeds actually matter? Does it justify the price difference.
Here's the 3 versions of the GTX 280 I am considering:
NZ$693.79 Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 1024MB DDR3
Graphics Clock 602 MHz
Processor Clock 1296 MHz
Memory Clock 1107 MHz
NZ$904.49 XFX GX-280N-ZDD9 XXX edition Geforce GTX 280 1GB GDDR3
Core Clock 670MHz shader 1458MHz
Memory Clock 2.5GHz
NZ$968.96 Microstar GF GTX 280 OverClocked 1GB DDR3 512-bit 650/2300M
This card is apparently factory over-clocked.
So firstly - why the price difference? What is the differences between these cards, and does it really make a substantial impact on performance, and therefore justify the price difference?
NOTE: I am not able to run an SLI configuration, as I only have 1x PCI-e slot, therefore this alternative is not possible.
Yours, utterly confused,
Acropoli