Opinion - Memory Specs (performance wise)

Hi, what's your opinion of the following memory specs?

Model: Veritech DDR2 800
Dram: 400MHz
FSB DRAM: 1:2
CAS LAT: 5.0 clocks
RAS to CAS DELAY: 5 clocks
RAS PRECHARGE: 5 clocks
CYCLE TIME: 16 clocks
COMMAND RATE: 2T

Is it poor, or medium performance wise?

The reason asked is although PC runs well, the ram is the lowest in regards to "Vista performance tool".

All the other hardware performance is higher rated ie. E4500, 7600GT, WD SATA HD, etc.

Thanks,

Vista performance rating is 4.8 which is rated by the lowest rating item of hardware, ie memory "in my case". (all hardware at stock - no OC).

My memory question was in regard to timings - mainly.

I mean u can get faster ram in DDR2 800.

Just wondered if a higher spec ram (still DDR2 800 but with faster timings), would do any improvement,

although no improvement is required as games, eg. GRAW run great with details set at max with no OCing involved.

These E4500's and 7600GT's are great

Agree with scotteq here ..

Well, IMO tighter timings (lower latency / higher spec) RAM will help increasing performance, esp. if you're doing some really memory intensive applications like image/video editing. But in case of normal gaming, I don't think you'll notice the difference.

Personally I don't care with those Vista rating My laptop got overall performance score 3.0 (due to it's NVIDIA Go6150 onboard graphic), and my friend's got score 4.3 (w/ Intel onboard X3xxx). But in actual performance, my laptop performs better (w/ better response feeling) than his.