Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Overclocking CPU while using 4 GB vs 8 GB RAM -- Does it Matter?

Last response: in Overclocking
Share
August 11, 2008 3:36:29 PM

I think this is most appropriate here in the Overclocking section...

New system is being delivered soon. The basics are:

Q6600
P45 MB (Asus P5Q Pro)
4 gb PC-6400 RAM (DDR2-800)
ATI 4870

I'll be overclocking the CPU, but not the other components. I'm going to try to keep my ram ratio at 1:1, either through using settings of 400 MHZ and 9 to get 3.6 GHZ or 400 mhz and 8 to get 3.2 ghz.

I was considering ordering another 2 sticks of RAM to put in here, since I'll be using 64-bit Vista.

My questions --

(1) will have 8 Gb / 4 sticks of RAM affect my overclocking at all?

(2) Not sure I understand bandwidth of memory and how it's limited by the MB's FSB -- having 4 gb vs 8 gb of memory isn't somehow limited by the FSB, is it?

Thanks in advance -- hope that all made sense!

More about : overclocking cpu ram matter

August 11, 2008 3:54:03 PM

No you should be fine, I use 8gb of ram as well and I can run my e8400 over 4ghz at stock voltages
August 11, 2008 6:59:26 PM

Thanks for the reply :) 

Still confused about memory bandwidth, though. The RAM can push out 6400, which is 800 X 8.

The MB can handle a throughput of what -- if it's running at a 400 mhz bus speed, isn't that 1600 FSB? So do you multiply that by 8 as well to get a total throughput of 12800?

And how do you account for the fact that each module of RAM will be pushing that much? So if the MB can accept 12800, and each RAM module pushes out 6400, then 4 GB of ram on 2 modules would be 12800. IF you add 4 more GB of RAM, you'd need 6400 X 4 or 25600 of bandwidth for all the data it can push, right? So the MB would be a bottleneck in that instance?

Thanks again -- hope that makes sense.
Related resources
August 11, 2008 7:32:51 PM

No, that would require quadruple channel. You would be using to sets of memory both in dual channel mode.
August 11, 2008 8:01:00 PM

So my number was correct for the MB, it can handle throughput of 12800?

And how is it exactly that the RAM gets to 12800? Are you saying that each module is 6400 one-way, or 12800? And that I don't add the capacity of all the ram together (so it would not be 12800 for each module, or 51200 for 4 modules?)?
August 14, 2008 10:51:35 AM

All the ram runs at 6400, it doesn't multiply by how many sticks you have. The 6400 is how many MB/s the ram transfers, the actual bus speed is 400mhz, and it doesnt change based on the amount of sticks you have.
August 15, 2008 2:40:40 PM

Actually it does double the bandwidh of RAM if you running dual channel. That's the point of dual channel. But 2 dual channel kits will still count as 12.4 GB/s (in case of 400 ram bus).

I think the bottlneck will be actually your memory controller on the motherboard.

I have P5Q Pro, E8400 and 4 GB
Running 1:1 at 400 mhz 4-4-4-15 timings
Theoretically the bandwidth of FSB to MCH (memory controller) is 12.4 GB/s and RAM to MCH 12.4 GB/s, but in synthetic ram bandwidth tests, ie sis sandra, I get max 7 GB/s (about 57% efficiency). This seems the maximum I can squeeze without rising the FSB. Rising FSB will also increase max bandwidth, so efficiency wont be better. I wish I knew why this bandwidth loss... timings? 7 GB/s on tRD 8 (the minimum my sys boot with at 400 FSB), and AI clock twister on "Stronger".

I think if you put 8 GB this wil stress the MCH even more, and you will get even less bandwidth. But this is just in my theory.
a b K Overclocking
a b à CPUs
August 15, 2008 5:13:14 PM

Sorry to contradict you, but with respect, it doubles because of DDR, or double data rate.
!